Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste
One often speaks of “dialogues of the deaf” whose origin would be the too great difference between modes of thought, especially in ethics or in politics. In order to clarify this issue, I suggest to distinguish between three notions: modes of thought in a strict sense, modes of beliefs and modes of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
University of Tel-Aviv
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Argumentation et Analyse du Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/aad/4396 |
| id |
doaj-28c74299641c42ccb05cdd36ffc5db15 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-28c74299641c42ccb05cdd36ffc5db152020-11-25T04:06:41ZfraUniversity of Tel-AvivArgumentation et Analyse du Discours1565-89612020-10-012510.4000/aad.4396Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationalisteAlban BouvierOne often speaks of “dialogues of the deaf” whose origin would be the too great difference between modes of thought, especially in ethics or in politics. In order to clarify this issue, I suggest to distinguish between three notions: modes of thought in a strict sense, modes of beliefs and modes of argumentation. I explain these notions at length by taking examples chosen either at the local level (e.g. social conflicts within companies) or at the global level (in particular religious and political conflicts involving references to Islamic doctrines). By adopting a critical rationalist viewpoint in social epistemology, I try to identify the conditions that would make agreements possible without restricting them to mere compromises.http://journals.openedition.org/aad/4396argumentation theorycritical rationalismmodes of thoughtrhetoricsocial epistemology |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
fra |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Alban Bouvier |
| spellingShingle |
Alban Bouvier Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste Argumentation et Analyse du Discours argumentation theory critical rationalism modes of thought rhetoric social epistemology |
| author_facet |
Alban Bouvier |
| author_sort |
Alban Bouvier |
| title |
Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste |
| title_short |
Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste |
| title_full |
Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste |
| title_fullStr |
Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. Un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste |
| title_sort |
modes de pensée, modes de croyances et modes d’argumentation. un point de vue d’épistémologie sociale rationaliste |
| publisher |
University of Tel-Aviv |
| series |
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours |
| issn |
1565-8961 |
| publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
| description |
One often speaks of “dialogues of the deaf” whose origin would be the too great difference between modes of thought, especially in ethics or in politics. In order to clarify this issue, I suggest to distinguish between three notions: modes of thought in a strict sense, modes of beliefs and modes of argumentation. I explain these notions at length by taking examples chosen either at the local level (e.g. social conflicts within companies) or at the global level (in particular religious and political conflicts involving references to Islamic doctrines). By adopting a critical rationalist viewpoint in social epistemology, I try to identify the conditions that would make agreements possible without restricting them to mere compromises. |
| topic |
argumentation theory critical rationalism modes of thought rhetoric social epistemology |
| url |
http://journals.openedition.org/aad/4396 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT albanbouvier modesdepenseemodesdecroyancesetmodesdargumentationunpointdevuedepistemologiesocialerationaliste |
| _version_ |
1724431086518272000 |