Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Good quality clinical trials are essential to inform the best cystic fibrosis (CF) management and care, by determining and comparing the effectiveness of new and existing therapies and drug delivery systems. The formal inclusion of quality of life (QoL) as an out...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hart Anna, Abbott Janice
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-03-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Online Access:http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/19
id doaj-28c60720ded74eac94fb4d9023857984
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28c60720ded74eac94fb4d90238579842020-11-25T00:38:28ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252005-03-01311910.1186/1477-7525-3-19Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical reviewHart AnnaAbbott Janice<p>Abstract</p> <p>Good quality clinical trials are essential to inform the best cystic fibrosis (CF) management and care, by determining and comparing the effectiveness of new and existing therapies and drug delivery systems. The formal inclusion of quality of life (QoL) as an outcome measure in CF clinical trials is becoming more common. Both an appropriate QoL measure and sound methodology are required in order to draw valid inferences about treatments and QoL. A review was undertaken of randomised controlled trials in cystic fibrosis where QoL was measured. EMBASE, MEDLINE and ISI Web of Science were searched to locate all full papers in the English language reporting randomised controlled trials in cystic fibrosis, published between January 1991 and December 2004. All Cochrane reviews published before December 2004 were hand searched. Papers were included if the authors had reported that they had measured QoL or well being in the trial. 16 trials were identified. The interventions investigated were: antibiotics (4); home versus hospital administration of antibiotics (1); steroids (1); mucolytic therapies (6); exercise (3) and pancreatic enzymes (1). Not one trial evaluated in this review provided conclusive results concerning QoL. This review highlights many of the pitfalls of QoL measurement in CF clinical trials and provides constructive information concerning the design and reporting of trials measuring QoL.</p> http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/19
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hart Anna
Abbott Janice
spellingShingle Hart Anna
Abbott Janice
Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
author_facet Hart Anna
Abbott Janice
author_sort Hart Anna
title Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review
title_short Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review
title_full Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review
title_fullStr Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review
title_sort measuring and reporting quality of life outcomes in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis: a critical review
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2005-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Good quality clinical trials are essential to inform the best cystic fibrosis (CF) management and care, by determining and comparing the effectiveness of new and existing therapies and drug delivery systems. The formal inclusion of quality of life (QoL) as an outcome measure in CF clinical trials is becoming more common. Both an appropriate QoL measure and sound methodology are required in order to draw valid inferences about treatments and QoL. A review was undertaken of randomised controlled trials in cystic fibrosis where QoL was measured. EMBASE, MEDLINE and ISI Web of Science were searched to locate all full papers in the English language reporting randomised controlled trials in cystic fibrosis, published between January 1991 and December 2004. All Cochrane reviews published before December 2004 were hand searched. Papers were included if the authors had reported that they had measured QoL or well being in the trial. 16 trials were identified. The interventions investigated were: antibiotics (4); home versus hospital administration of antibiotics (1); steroids (1); mucolytic therapies (6); exercise (3) and pancreatic enzymes (1). Not one trial evaluated in this review provided conclusive results concerning QoL. This review highlights many of the pitfalls of QoL measurement in CF clinical trials and provides constructive information concerning the design and reporting of trials measuring QoL.</p>
url http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/19
work_keys_str_mv AT hartanna measuringandreportingqualityoflifeoutcomesinclinicaltrialsincysticfibrosisacriticalreview
AT abbottjanice measuringandreportingqualityoflifeoutcomesinclinicaltrialsincysticfibrosisacriticalreview
_version_ 1725297376992690176