Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot study

Background: The chemomechanical plaque control measures are helpful in controlling dental plaque and thus caries, especially in pediatric age group. Aim: This study aims to compare effectiveness of herbal mouthrinse containing Terminalia chebula to that of 0.2% chlorhexidine against children's...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swara Shah, Seema Bargale, Bhavna H Dave, Anshula Deshpande, Pratik B Kariya, Anuradha Karri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=3;spage=440;epage=445;aulast=Shah
id doaj-28aa612b6401499e8a1f2f5cb6c8195f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28aa612b6401499e8a1f2f5cb6c8195f2020-11-25T01:26:59ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612018-01-019344044510.4103/ccd.ccd_264_18Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot studySwara ShahSeema BargaleBhavna H DaveAnshula DeshpandePratik B KariyaAnuradha KarriBackground: The chemomechanical plaque control measures are helpful in controlling dental plaque and thus caries, especially in pediatric age group. Aim: This study aims to compare effectiveness of herbal mouthrinse containing Terminalia chebula to that of 0.2% chlorhexidine against children's salivary mutans streptococci levels. Settings and Design: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study design will be framed for conducting this study. Methods: A total of 45 participants were randomly categorized in Group 1, Group 2, or Group 3 (control group, experimental group, or negative control). Baseline unstimulated saliva was collected. All the participants were instructed regarding the use of mouthrinse for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, again unstimulated saliva was collected. After collection, saliva samples were sent for microbiological analysis. Statistical Analysis: The mean colony-forming units (CFU/ml) were determined. Paired t-test, ANOVA test, and post hoc test were applied for statistical analysis. Results: Statistically significant difference in CFU count has been observed in 0.2% chlorhexidine and Oratreat groups at 15 days as compared to baseline (P < 0.001). At 15 days, reduction in CFU count has seen more in Oratreat group as compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine group, and the difference is statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: 0.2% chlorhexidine and Oratreat mouthwash reduce the salivary Streptococcus mutans count. Oratreat herbal mouthwash has proved to be better as compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=3;spage=440;epage=445;aulast=ShahChlorhexidinedental cariesherbalmouthwashTerminalia chebula
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Swara Shah
Seema Bargale
Bhavna H Dave
Anshula Deshpande
Pratik B Kariya
Anuradha Karri
spellingShingle Swara Shah
Seema Bargale
Bhavna H Dave
Anshula Deshpande
Pratik B Kariya
Anuradha Karri
Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot study
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Chlorhexidine
dental caries
herbal
mouthwash
Terminalia chebula
author_facet Swara Shah
Seema Bargale
Bhavna H Dave
Anshula Deshpande
Pratik B Kariya
Anuradha Karri
author_sort Swara Shah
title Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_short Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_full Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_fullStr Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary Streptococcus mutans: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_sort comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of (between) 0.2% chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash on salivary streptococcus mutans: a randomized controlled pilot study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
issn 0976-237X
0976-2361
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background: The chemomechanical plaque control measures are helpful in controlling dental plaque and thus caries, especially in pediatric age group. Aim: This study aims to compare effectiveness of herbal mouthrinse containing Terminalia chebula to that of 0.2% chlorhexidine against children's salivary mutans streptococci levels. Settings and Design: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study design will be framed for conducting this study. Methods: A total of 45 participants were randomly categorized in Group 1, Group 2, or Group 3 (control group, experimental group, or negative control). Baseline unstimulated saliva was collected. All the participants were instructed regarding the use of mouthrinse for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, again unstimulated saliva was collected. After collection, saliva samples were sent for microbiological analysis. Statistical Analysis: The mean colony-forming units (CFU/ml) were determined. Paired t-test, ANOVA test, and post hoc test were applied for statistical analysis. Results: Statistically significant difference in CFU count has been observed in 0.2% chlorhexidine and Oratreat groups at 15 days as compared to baseline (P < 0.001). At 15 days, reduction in CFU count has seen more in Oratreat group as compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine group, and the difference is statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: 0.2% chlorhexidine and Oratreat mouthwash reduce the salivary Streptococcus mutans count. Oratreat herbal mouthwash has proved to be better as compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash.
topic Chlorhexidine
dental caries
herbal
mouthwash
Terminalia chebula
url http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=3;spage=440;epage=445;aulast=Shah
work_keys_str_mv AT swarashah comparisonofantimicrobialefficacyofbetween02chlorhexidineandherbalmouthwashonsalivarystreptococcusmutansarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT seemabargale comparisonofantimicrobialefficacyofbetween02chlorhexidineandherbalmouthwashonsalivarystreptococcusmutansarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT bhavnahdave comparisonofantimicrobialefficacyofbetween02chlorhexidineandherbalmouthwashonsalivarystreptococcusmutansarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT anshuladeshpande comparisonofantimicrobialefficacyofbetween02chlorhexidineandherbalmouthwashonsalivarystreptococcusmutansarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT pratikbkariya comparisonofantimicrobialefficacyofbetween02chlorhexidineandherbalmouthwashonsalivarystreptococcusmutansarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT anuradhakarri comparisonofantimicrobialefficacyofbetween02chlorhexidineandherbalmouthwashonsalivarystreptococcusmutansarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
_version_ 1725107633834164224