Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it?
Many families employ private tutors to help children with their schoolwork, thus participating in a 'shadow education' system that supplements normal schooling. International surveys show that there is wide variation in the extent of tutoring in different countries. This paper considers r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UCL Press
2004-06-01
|
Series: | London Review of Education |
Online Access: | https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=40c98f39-da1e-4dd1-85cd-ccefe9a8050d |
id |
doaj-28a4597e32b54e90ad1f9515f7add0f3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-28a4597e32b54e90ad1f9515f7add0f32020-12-16T09:43:34ZengUCL PressLondon Review of Education1474-84792004-06-0110.1080/1474846042000229458Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it?Judith IresonMany families employ private tutors to help children with their schoolwork, thus participating in a 'shadow education' system that supplements normal schooling. International surveys show that there is wide variation in the extent of tutoring in different countries. This paper considers reasons for this variation and evaluates evidence on the prevalence and effectiveness of private tutoring. The effectiveness of tutoring is mixed, with some well-designed programmes achieving large gains in attainment, whereas surveys show little impact. Some of these discrepancies arise from weak conceptualisation and methodological issues. It is argued that quality indicators should be added to analyses of survey data to provide more reliable estimates. Evidence from research on extra-curricular activities is used to explore the 'penumbra' between public and private sector involvement. Systematic monitoring of the shadow system is recommended. Policies should be developed, as it is likely that the prevalence of private tutoring will increase.https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=40c98f39-da1e-4dd1-85cd-ccefe9a8050d |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Judith Ireson |
spellingShingle |
Judith Ireson Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? London Review of Education |
author_facet |
Judith Ireson |
author_sort |
Judith Ireson |
title |
Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? |
title_short |
Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? |
title_full |
Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? |
title_fullStr |
Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? |
title_sort |
private tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? |
publisher |
UCL Press |
series |
London Review of Education |
issn |
1474-8479 |
publishDate |
2004-06-01 |
description |
Many families employ private tutors to help children with their schoolwork, thus participating in a 'shadow education' system that supplements normal schooling. International surveys show that there is wide variation in the extent of tutoring in different countries. This paper considers
reasons for this variation and evaluates evidence on the prevalence and effectiveness of private tutoring. The effectiveness of tutoring is mixed, with some well-designed programmes achieving large gains in attainment, whereas surveys show little impact. Some of these discrepancies arise from
weak conceptualisation and methodological issues. It is argued that quality indicators should be added to analyses of survey data to provide more reliable estimates. Evidence from research on extra-curricular activities is used to explore the 'penumbra' between public and private sector involvement.
Systematic monitoring of the shadow system is recommended. Policies should be developed, as it is likely that the prevalence of private tutoring will increase. |
url |
https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=40c98f39-da1e-4dd1-85cd-ccefe9a8050d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT judithireson privatetutoringhowprevalentandeffectiveisit |
_version_ |
1724381475314335744 |