Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology Integration

The purpose of this descriptive-correlational study was to assess the level of innovativeness of Oklahoma secondary agricultural education teachers regarding their use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB). The study also sought to determine if relationships existed between teachers’ IWB innovativenes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. C. Bunch, J. Shane Robinson, M. Craig Edwards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mississippi State University 2015-02-01
Series:Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
Subjects:
Online Access:http://media.wix.com/ugd/c8fe6e_39d77732814f40ae978995f75ff5c4dc.pdf
id doaj-28a127de37224c2cafc1f779355e6a99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28a127de37224c2cafc1f779355e6a992020-11-25T02:36:30ZengMississippi State UniversityJournal of Human Sciences and Extension2325-52262325-52262015-02-01316379Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology IntegrationJ. C. Bunch0J. Shane Robinson1M. Craig Edwards2Louisiana State UniversityOklahoma State UniversityOklahoma State UniversityThe purpose of this descriptive-correlational study was to assess the level of innovativeness of Oklahoma secondary agricultural education teachers regarding their use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB). The study also sought to determine if relationships existed between teachers’ IWB innovativeness scores and selected personal and professional characteristics. The findings of this study revealed that as a teacher’s age and years of teaching experience increased, his or her perceived level of innovativeness regarding use of interactive whiteboards (IWBs) decreased. Therefore, younger and less experienced teachers were further advanced in Rogers’s (2003) innovation-decision process. In addition, this study found that a majority of the agriculture teachers were in the implementation and confirmation stages of the innovation-decision process. Implications and recommendations point to creating professional development experiences for teachers in the knowledge and persuasion stages of the innovation-decision process to learn about effective use of IWBs, to acquire procedural or “how-to” knowledge of the IWB, and to have opportunities to practice using it. Additional research should examine how the use of IWBs affects student learning and achievement in school-based agricultural education.http://media.wix.com/ugd/c8fe6e_39d77732814f40ae978995f75ff5c4dc.pdfadoptionagriculture teachersinnovativenessinteractive whiteboardSTEM
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. C. Bunch
J. Shane Robinson
M. Craig Edwards
spellingShingle J. C. Bunch
J. Shane Robinson
M. Craig Edwards
Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology Integration
Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
adoption
agriculture teachers
innovativeness
interactive whiteboard
STEM
author_facet J. C. Bunch
J. Shane Robinson
M. Craig Edwards
author_sort J. C. Bunch
title Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology Integration
title_short Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology Integration
title_full Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology Integration
title_fullStr Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology Integration
title_full_unstemmed Agriculture Teachers’ Use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs): Teachers’ Perceptions of Innovativeness and Technology Integration
title_sort agriculture teachers’ use of interactive whiteboards (iwbs): teachers’ perceptions of innovativeness and technology integration
publisher Mississippi State University
series Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
issn 2325-5226
2325-5226
publishDate 2015-02-01
description The purpose of this descriptive-correlational study was to assess the level of innovativeness of Oklahoma secondary agricultural education teachers regarding their use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB). The study also sought to determine if relationships existed between teachers’ IWB innovativeness scores and selected personal and professional characteristics. The findings of this study revealed that as a teacher’s age and years of teaching experience increased, his or her perceived level of innovativeness regarding use of interactive whiteboards (IWBs) decreased. Therefore, younger and less experienced teachers were further advanced in Rogers’s (2003) innovation-decision process. In addition, this study found that a majority of the agriculture teachers were in the implementation and confirmation stages of the innovation-decision process. Implications and recommendations point to creating professional development experiences for teachers in the knowledge and persuasion stages of the innovation-decision process to learn about effective use of IWBs, to acquire procedural or “how-to” knowledge of the IWB, and to have opportunities to practice using it. Additional research should examine how the use of IWBs affects student learning and achievement in school-based agricultural education.
topic adoption
agriculture teachers
innovativeness
interactive whiteboard
STEM
url http://media.wix.com/ugd/c8fe6e_39d77732814f40ae978995f75ff5c4dc.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jcbunch agricultureteachersuseofinteractivewhiteboardsiwbsteachersperceptionsofinnovativenessandtechnologyintegration
AT jshanerobinson agricultureteachersuseofinteractivewhiteboardsiwbsteachersperceptionsofinnovativenessandtechnologyintegration
AT mcraigedwards agricultureteachersuseofinteractivewhiteboardsiwbsteachersperceptionsofinnovativenessandtechnologyintegration
_version_ 1724799831025647616