Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblast

  Background and Aims: Indirect composites are designed to overcome the shortcomings of direct composites such as polymerization shrinkage and low degree of conversion. But, good adhesion of resin cements to indirect composites is still difficult. This research was designed to assess the effect of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansure Mirzaee, Esmaeel Yassini, Sima Shahabi, Nasim Chiniforoush, Naznin Zeinab Garshasbzade
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-04-01
Series:Journal of Dental Medicine
Subjects:
Er
Online Access:http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-736&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-288e41431ef5474abdb68b93682666c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-288e41431ef5474abdb68b93682666c22020-11-25T00:08:04ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442014-04-012713136Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblastMansure Mirzaee0Esmaeel Yassini1Sima Shahabi2Nasim Chiniforoush3Naznin Zeinab Garshasbzade4   Background and Aims: Indirect composites are designed to overcome the shortcomings of direct composites such as polymerization shrinkage and low degree of conversion. But, good adhesion of resin cements to indirect composites is still difficult. This research was designed to assess the effect of different powers of Er;YAG laser compared with sandblasting. On the micro tensil bond strength of resin cement to indirect composites.   Materials and Methods: Specimens were prepred using dental resin composite (Gradia GC) and metallic mold (15×5×5 mm) and were cured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 24 blocks were prepared and randomly divided into 12 groups. G1:no treatment (as control), G 2-6: Er; YAG laser irradiation (2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Watt), G7: sandblast. Two composite blocks were bonded to each other with Panavia F.2. resin cement. The cylindrical sections with dimensions of 1 mm were tested in a microtensile bond strength tester device using 0.5 mm/min speed until fracture points. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and T-test.   Results: Interaction between lasers irradiation and sandblast treatments were significant (P<0.05). Thus, T-test was used for comparing laser groups. T-test showed that when using laser with energies less than 150 mJ, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) whether samples were sandblasted or not. Samples which received 300 mJ of laser showed lower bond strength compared with no laser treatment. Other groups showed no significant difference (P>0.05).   Conclusion: It seems that application of sandblast with proper variables, is a good way to improve bond strength.Laser application had no influence in improving the bond strength between the indirect composite and resin cement. http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-736&slc_lang=en&sid=1Indirect composite ErYAG laser Bond strength
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mansure Mirzaee
Esmaeel Yassini
Sima Shahabi
Nasim Chiniforoush
Naznin Zeinab Garshasbzade
spellingShingle Mansure Mirzaee
Esmaeel Yassini
Sima Shahabi
Nasim Chiniforoush
Naznin Zeinab Garshasbzade
Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblast
Journal of Dental Medicine
Indirect composite
Er
YAG laser
Bond strength
author_facet Mansure Mirzaee
Esmaeel Yassini
Sima Shahabi
Nasim Chiniforoush
Naznin Zeinab Garshasbzade
author_sort Mansure Mirzaee
title Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblast
title_short Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblast
title_full Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblast
title_fullStr Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblast
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by Er;YAG laser and sandblast
title_sort comparison of the resin cement bond strength to an indirect composites treated by er;yag laser and sandblast
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Medicine
issn 1024-641X
2008-2444
publishDate 2014-04-01
description   Background and Aims: Indirect composites are designed to overcome the shortcomings of direct composites such as polymerization shrinkage and low degree of conversion. But, good adhesion of resin cements to indirect composites is still difficult. This research was designed to assess the effect of different powers of Er;YAG laser compared with sandblasting. On the micro tensil bond strength of resin cement to indirect composites.   Materials and Methods: Specimens were prepred using dental resin composite (Gradia GC) and metallic mold (15×5×5 mm) and were cured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 24 blocks were prepared and randomly divided into 12 groups. G1:no treatment (as control), G 2-6: Er; YAG laser irradiation (2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Watt), G7: sandblast. Two composite blocks were bonded to each other with Panavia F.2. resin cement. The cylindrical sections with dimensions of 1 mm were tested in a microtensile bond strength tester device using 0.5 mm/min speed until fracture points. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and T-test.   Results: Interaction between lasers irradiation and sandblast treatments were significant (P<0.05). Thus, T-test was used for comparing laser groups. T-test showed that when using laser with energies less than 150 mJ, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) whether samples were sandblasted or not. Samples which received 300 mJ of laser showed lower bond strength compared with no laser treatment. Other groups showed no significant difference (P>0.05).   Conclusion: It seems that application of sandblast with proper variables, is a good way to improve bond strength.Laser application had no influence in improving the bond strength between the indirect composite and resin cement.
topic Indirect composite
Er
YAG laser
Bond strength
url http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-736&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT mansuremirzaee comparisonoftheresincementbondstrengthtoanindirectcompositestreatedbyeryaglaserandsandblast
AT esmaeelyassini comparisonoftheresincementbondstrengthtoanindirectcompositestreatedbyeryaglaserandsandblast
AT simashahabi comparisonoftheresincementbondstrengthtoanindirectcompositestreatedbyeryaglaserandsandblast
AT nasimchiniforoush comparisonoftheresincementbondstrengthtoanindirectcompositestreatedbyeryaglaserandsandblast
AT nazninzeinabgarshasbzade comparisonoftheresincementbondstrengthtoanindirectcompositestreatedbyeryaglaserandsandblast
_version_ 1725416944426811392