What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18

Children are afforded a number of protections when they encounter the criminal justice system. The need for special protection stems from the vulnerable position children occupy in society. When children form part of the criminal justice system, either by being an offender, victim, or witness, they...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sophy Baird
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2021-09-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/9571
id doaj-28842b1ae37d4fc7b154fd2bcb21402e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28842b1ae37d4fc7b154fd2bcb21402e2021-09-16T06:11:47ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812021-09-012410.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a9571What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18Sophy Baird0University of Pretoria Children are afforded a number of protections when they encounter the criminal justice system. The need for special protection stems from the vulnerable position children occupy in society. When children form part of the criminal justice system, either by being an offender, victim, or witness, they may be subjected to harm. To mitigate against the potential harm that may be caused, our law provides that criminal proceedings involving children should not be open to the public, subject to the discretion of the court. This protection naturally seems at odds with the principle of open justice. However, the courts have reconciled the limitation with the legal purpose it serves. For all the protection and the lengths that the law goes to protect the identity of children in this regard, it appears there is an unofficial timer dictating when this protection should end. The media have been at the forefront of this conundrum to the extent that they believe that once a child (offender, victim, or witness) turns 18 years old, they are free to reveal the child's identity. This belief, grounded in the right to freedom of expression and the principle of open justice, is at odds with the principle of child's best interests, right to dignity and the right to privacy. It also stares incredulously in the face of the aims of the Child Justice Act and the principles of restorative justice. Measured against the detrimental psychological effects experienced by child victims, witnesses, and offenders, this article aims to critically analyse the legal and practical implications of revealing the identity of child victims, witnesses, and offenders after they turn 18 years old. https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/9571Children's rightschild justicebest interests of the childprotection of identityfreedom of expressioopen justice
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophy Baird
spellingShingle Sophy Baird
What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Children's rights
child justice
best interests of the child
protection of identity
freedom of expressio
open justice
author_facet Sophy Baird
author_sort Sophy Baird
title What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18
title_short What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18
title_full What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18
title_fullStr What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18
title_full_unstemmed What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18
title_sort what of the child? preventing the publication of children's names after the age of 18
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Children are afforded a number of protections when they encounter the criminal justice system. The need for special protection stems from the vulnerable position children occupy in society. When children form part of the criminal justice system, either by being an offender, victim, or witness, they may be subjected to harm. To mitigate against the potential harm that may be caused, our law provides that criminal proceedings involving children should not be open to the public, subject to the discretion of the court. This protection naturally seems at odds with the principle of open justice. However, the courts have reconciled the limitation with the legal purpose it serves. For all the protection and the lengths that the law goes to protect the identity of children in this regard, it appears there is an unofficial timer dictating when this protection should end. The media have been at the forefront of this conundrum to the extent that they believe that once a child (offender, victim, or witness) turns 18 years old, they are free to reveal the child's identity. This belief, grounded in the right to freedom of expression and the principle of open justice, is at odds with the principle of child's best interests, right to dignity and the right to privacy. It also stares incredulously in the face of the aims of the Child Justice Act and the principles of restorative justice. Measured against the detrimental psychological effects experienced by child victims, witnesses, and offenders, this article aims to critically analyse the legal and practical implications of revealing the identity of child victims, witnesses, and offenders after they turn 18 years old.
topic Children's rights
child justice
best interests of the child
protection of identity
freedom of expressio
open justice
url https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/9571
work_keys_str_mv AT sophybaird whatofthechildpreventingthepublicationofchildrensnamesaftertheageof18
_version_ 1717378293131378688