16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.

A Winogradsky column is a clear glass or plastic column filled with enriched sediment. Over time, microbial communities in the sediment grow in a stratified ecosystem with an oxic top layer and anoxic sub-surface layers. Winogradsky columns have been used extensively to demonstrate microbial nutrien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ethan A Rundell, Lois M Banta, Doyle V Ward, Corey D Watts, Bruce Birren, David J Esteban
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4125166?pdf=render
id doaj-287e87bb47a540b4a343f99dd92892ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-287e87bb47a540b4a343f99dd92892ed2020-11-25T01:56:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10413410.1371/journal.pone.010413416S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.Ethan A RundellLois M BantaDoyle V WardCorey D WattsBruce BirrenDavid J EstebanA Winogradsky column is a clear glass or plastic column filled with enriched sediment. Over time, microbial communities in the sediment grow in a stratified ecosystem with an oxic top layer and anoxic sub-surface layers. Winogradsky columns have been used extensively to demonstrate microbial nutrient cycling and metabolic diversity in undergraduate microbiology labs. In this study, we used high-throughput 16s rRNA gene sequencing to investigate the microbial diversity of Winogradsky columns. Specifically, we tested the impact of sediment source, supplemental cellulose source, and depth within the column, on microbial community structure. We found that the Winogradsky columns were highly diverse communities but are dominated by three phyla: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. The community is structured by a founding population dependent on the source of sediment used to prepare the columns and is differentiated by depth within the column. Numerous biomarkers were identified distinguishing sample depth, including Cyanobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria as biomarkers of the soil-water interface, and Clostridia as a biomarker of the deepest depth. Supplemental cellulose source impacted community structure but less strongly than depth and sediment source. In columns dominated by Firmicutes, the family Peptococcaceae was the most abundant sulfate reducer, while in columns abundant in Proteobacteria, several Deltaproteobacteria families, including Desulfobacteraceae, were found, showing that different taxonomic groups carry out sulfur cycling in different columns. This study brings this historical method for enrichment culture of chemolithotrophs and other soil bacteria into the modern era of microbiology and demonstrates the potential of the Winogradsky column as a model system for investigating the effect of environmental variables on soil microbial communities.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4125166?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ethan A Rundell
Lois M Banta
Doyle V Ward
Corey D Watts
Bruce Birren
David J Esteban
spellingShingle Ethan A Rundell
Lois M Banta
Doyle V Ward
Corey D Watts
Bruce Birren
David J Esteban
16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ethan A Rundell
Lois M Banta
Doyle V Ward
Corey D Watts
Bruce Birren
David J Esteban
author_sort Ethan A Rundell
title 16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.
title_short 16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.
title_full 16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.
title_fullStr 16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.
title_full_unstemmed 16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.
title_sort 16s rrna gene survey of microbial communities in winogradsky columns.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description A Winogradsky column is a clear glass or plastic column filled with enriched sediment. Over time, microbial communities in the sediment grow in a stratified ecosystem with an oxic top layer and anoxic sub-surface layers. Winogradsky columns have been used extensively to demonstrate microbial nutrient cycling and metabolic diversity in undergraduate microbiology labs. In this study, we used high-throughput 16s rRNA gene sequencing to investigate the microbial diversity of Winogradsky columns. Specifically, we tested the impact of sediment source, supplemental cellulose source, and depth within the column, on microbial community structure. We found that the Winogradsky columns were highly diverse communities but are dominated by three phyla: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. The community is structured by a founding population dependent on the source of sediment used to prepare the columns and is differentiated by depth within the column. Numerous biomarkers were identified distinguishing sample depth, including Cyanobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria as biomarkers of the soil-water interface, and Clostridia as a biomarker of the deepest depth. Supplemental cellulose source impacted community structure but less strongly than depth and sediment source. In columns dominated by Firmicutes, the family Peptococcaceae was the most abundant sulfate reducer, while in columns abundant in Proteobacteria, several Deltaproteobacteria families, including Desulfobacteraceae, were found, showing that different taxonomic groups carry out sulfur cycling in different columns. This study brings this historical method for enrichment culture of chemolithotrophs and other soil bacteria into the modern era of microbiology and demonstrates the potential of the Winogradsky column as a model system for investigating the effect of environmental variables on soil microbial communities.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4125166?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ethanarundell 16srrnagenesurveyofmicrobialcommunitiesinwinogradskycolumns
AT loismbanta 16srrnagenesurveyofmicrobialcommunitiesinwinogradskycolumns
AT doylevward 16srrnagenesurveyofmicrobialcommunitiesinwinogradskycolumns
AT coreydwatts 16srrnagenesurveyofmicrobialcommunitiesinwinogradskycolumns
AT brucebirren 16srrnagenesurveyofmicrobialcommunitiesinwinogradskycolumns
AT davidjesteban 16srrnagenesurveyofmicrobialcommunitiesinwinogradskycolumns
_version_ 1724977464866766848