Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of Force

In this paper, finite element analysis demonstrates the difference between dual-permanent-magnet-excited machines (DPMM) and surface-mounted permanent magnet machines (SPM) in terms of tangential force at the same air gap, diameter, stacking length, and input current. Different from most conventiona...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minh-Trung Duong, Do-Hyun Kang, Yon-Do Chun, Byung-Chul Woo, Yoon-Sun Lee, Hwang Wook
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/216
id doaj-287b5d17ed7c4d1ba2a25c2152fbb9b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-287b5d17ed7c4d1ba2a25c2152fbb9b02020-11-25T02:48:14ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-01-0112221610.3390/en12020216en12020216Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of ForceMinh-Trung Duong0Do-Hyun Kang1Yon-Do Chun2Byung-Chul Woo3Yoon-Sun Lee4Hwang Wook5Energy and Power Conversion Engineering, Unversity of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, KoreaElectric Motor Research Center, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, Changwon 51543, KoreaEnergy and Power Conversion Engineering, Unversity of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, KoreaElectric Motor Research Center, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, Changwon 51543, KoreaSchool of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 17546, KoreaElectric Motor Research Center, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, Changwon 51543, KoreaIn this paper, finite element analysis demonstrates the difference between dual-permanent-magnet-excited machines (DPMM) and surface-mounted permanent magnet machines (SPM) in terms of tangential force at the same air gap, diameter, stacking length, and input current. Different from most conventional machines, a novel DPMM has two sets of permanent magnets employed on both stator and rotor. To make a fair comparison, the novel DPMM, based on an original design, is specified to have the same dimensions as a conventional SPM. With the aid of 2D finite element analysis, tangential force generated from the novel DPMM is 167.65% higher than the conventional SPM. To verify the validity of the analyses, a prototype was fabricated and tested. Experiments showed that average deviation was only approximately 1.85%.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/216dual-permanent-magnet-excited machinesurface-mounted permanent magnet machineforce density
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Minh-Trung Duong
Do-Hyun Kang
Yon-Do Chun
Byung-Chul Woo
Yoon-Sun Lee
Hwang Wook
spellingShingle Minh-Trung Duong
Do-Hyun Kang
Yon-Do Chun
Byung-Chul Woo
Yoon-Sun Lee
Hwang Wook
Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of Force
Energies
dual-permanent-magnet-excited machine
surface-mounted permanent magnet machine
force density
author_facet Minh-Trung Duong
Do-Hyun Kang
Yon-Do Chun
Byung-Chul Woo
Yoon-Sun Lee
Hwang Wook
author_sort Minh-Trung Duong
title Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of Force
title_short Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of Force
title_full Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of Force
title_fullStr Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of Force
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machines and Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines in Terms of Force
title_sort comparison of dual-permanent-magnet-excited machines and surface-mounted permanent magnet machines in terms of force
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In this paper, finite element analysis demonstrates the difference between dual-permanent-magnet-excited machines (DPMM) and surface-mounted permanent magnet machines (SPM) in terms of tangential force at the same air gap, diameter, stacking length, and input current. Different from most conventional machines, a novel DPMM has two sets of permanent magnets employed on both stator and rotor. To make a fair comparison, the novel DPMM, based on an original design, is specified to have the same dimensions as a conventional SPM. With the aid of 2D finite element analysis, tangential force generated from the novel DPMM is 167.65% higher than the conventional SPM. To verify the validity of the analyses, a prototype was fabricated and tested. Experiments showed that average deviation was only approximately 1.85%.
topic dual-permanent-magnet-excited machine
surface-mounted permanent magnet machine
force density
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/216
work_keys_str_mv AT minhtrungduong comparisonofdualpermanentmagnetexcitedmachinesandsurfacemountedpermanentmagnetmachinesintermsofforce
AT dohyunkang comparisonofdualpermanentmagnetexcitedmachinesandsurfacemountedpermanentmagnetmachinesintermsofforce
AT yondochun comparisonofdualpermanentmagnetexcitedmachinesandsurfacemountedpermanentmagnetmachinesintermsofforce
AT byungchulwoo comparisonofdualpermanentmagnetexcitedmachinesandsurfacemountedpermanentmagnetmachinesintermsofforce
AT yoonsunlee comparisonofdualpermanentmagnetexcitedmachinesandsurfacemountedpermanentmagnetmachinesintermsofforce
AT hwangwook comparisonofdualpermanentmagnetexcitedmachinesandsurfacemountedpermanentmagnetmachinesintermsofforce
_version_ 1724749022311219200