When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
The aim of this study is to analyze the discursive construction of practices of evidence use during argumentation in science lessons in a 3rd grade classroom. We selected an event considered a telling case to analyze face-to-face interactions. We adopted elements of the ethnographic perspective in e...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Investigações em Ensino de Ciências |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/731 |
id |
doaj-286f6bda9a164971839d8e5344d251fc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-286f6bda9a164971839d8e5344d251fc2020-11-25T00:17:39ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Investigações em Ensino de Ciências1518-87952017-12-0122310212410.22600/1518-8795.ienci2017v22n3p102470When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessonsLuiz Gustavo Franco Silveira0Danusa Munford1Faculdade de Educação Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, BrasilCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas Universidade Federal do ABC Av. dos Estados, 5001, Santo André, São Paulo, BrasilThe aim of this study is to analyze the discursive construction of practices of evidence use during argumentation in science lessons in a 3rd grade classroom. We selected an event considered a telling case to analyze face-to-face interactions. We adopted elements of the ethnographic perspective in education and of the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Our results indicate that participants’ argumentation was organized around two foci: one generated by disagreements about directive questions, demanded presentation of points of view and arguments with evidence; the second one, generated by disagreements about metacognitive questions, led to discussions around evidence use. In addition, we indicate the complexity of the process of relating evidence to a particular claim through an interaction in which opposite points of view were supported by the same observations. We examine our results in the light of research on argumentation at elementary school, and we suggest implications for teaching practice and research in science education.https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/731ArgumentaçãoUso de EvidênciasAnos Iniciais do Ensino FundamentalEtnografia em Educação |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira Danusa Munford |
spellingShingle |
Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira Danusa Munford When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons Investigações em Ensino de Ciências Argumentação Uso de Evidências Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental Etnografia em Educação |
author_facet |
Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira Danusa Munford |
author_sort |
Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira |
title |
When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons |
title_short |
When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons |
title_full |
When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons |
title_fullStr |
When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons |
title_full_unstemmed |
When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons |
title_sort |
when children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
series |
Investigações em Ensino de Ciências |
issn |
1518-8795 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
The aim of this study is to analyze the discursive construction of practices of evidence use during argumentation in science lessons in a 3rd grade classroom. We selected an event considered a telling case to analyze face-to-face interactions. We adopted elements of the ethnographic perspective in education and of the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Our results indicate that participants’ argumentation was organized around two foci: one generated by disagreements about directive questions, demanded presentation of points of view and arguments with evidence; the second one, generated by disagreements about metacognitive questions, led to discussions around evidence use. In addition, we indicate the complexity of the process of relating evidence to a particular claim through an interaction in which opposite points of view were supported by the same observations. We examine our results in the light of research on argumentation at elementary school, and we suggest implications for teaching practice and research in science education. |
topic |
Argumentação Uso de Evidências Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental Etnografia em Educação |
url |
https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/731 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luizgustavofrancosilveira whenchildrenarguethediscursiveconstructionofevidenceuseininquirysciencelessons AT danusamunford whenchildrenarguethediscursiveconstructionofevidenceuseininquirysciencelessons |
_version_ |
1725378620986228736 |