When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons

The aim of this study is to analyze the discursive construction of practices of evidence use during argumentation in science lessons in a 3rd grade classroom. We selected an event considered a telling case to analyze face-to-face interactions. We adopted elements of the ethnographic perspective in e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira, Danusa Munford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul 2017-12-01
Series:Investigações em Ensino de Ciências
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/731
id doaj-286f6bda9a164971839d8e5344d251fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-286f6bda9a164971839d8e5344d251fc2020-11-25T00:17:39ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Investigações em Ensino de Ciências1518-87952017-12-0122310212410.22600/1518-8795.ienci2017v22n3p102470When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessonsLuiz Gustavo Franco Silveira0Danusa Munford1Faculdade de Educação Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, BrasilCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas Universidade Federal do ABC Av. dos Estados, 5001, Santo André, São Paulo, BrasilThe aim of this study is to analyze the discursive construction of practices of evidence use during argumentation in science lessons in a 3rd grade classroom. We selected an event considered a telling case to analyze face-to-face interactions. We adopted elements of the ethnographic perspective in education and of the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Our results indicate that participants’ argumentation was organized around two foci: one generated by disagreements about directive questions, demanded presentation of points of view and arguments with evidence; the second one, generated by disagreements about metacognitive questions, led to discussions around evidence use. In addition, we indicate the complexity of the process of relating evidence to a particular claim through an interaction in which opposite points of view were supported by the same observations. We examine our results in the light of research on argumentation at elementary school, and we suggest implications for teaching practice and research in science education.https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/731ArgumentaçãoUso de EvidênciasAnos Iniciais do Ensino FundamentalEtnografia em Educação
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira
Danusa Munford
spellingShingle Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira
Danusa Munford
When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
Investigações em Ensino de Ciências
Argumentação
Uso de Evidências
Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental
Etnografia em Educação
author_facet Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira
Danusa Munford
author_sort Luiz Gustavo Franco Silveira
title When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
title_short When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
title_full When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
title_fullStr When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
title_full_unstemmed When children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
title_sort when children argue: the discursive construction of evidence use in inquiry science lessons
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
series Investigações em Ensino de Ciências
issn 1518-8795
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The aim of this study is to analyze the discursive construction of practices of evidence use during argumentation in science lessons in a 3rd grade classroom. We selected an event considered a telling case to analyze face-to-face interactions. We adopted elements of the ethnographic perspective in education and of the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Our results indicate that participants’ argumentation was organized around two foci: one generated by disagreements about directive questions, demanded presentation of points of view and arguments with evidence; the second one, generated by disagreements about metacognitive questions, led to discussions around evidence use. In addition, we indicate the complexity of the process of relating evidence to a particular claim through an interaction in which opposite points of view were supported by the same observations. We examine our results in the light of research on argumentation at elementary school, and we suggest implications for teaching practice and research in science education.
topic Argumentação
Uso de Evidências
Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental
Etnografia em Educação
url https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/731
work_keys_str_mv AT luizgustavofrancosilveira whenchildrenarguethediscursiveconstructionofevidenceuseininquirysciencelessons
AT danusamunford whenchildrenarguethediscursiveconstructionofevidenceuseininquirysciencelessons
_version_ 1725378620986228736