Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper
The European Commission published a White Paper on 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of EU antitrust rules. The content of the White Paper is since then being prepared to be converted into EU legislation on private antitrust enforcement. This paper presents the developments in private antit...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Warsaw
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/55.pdf |
id |
doaj-286e05cb367a427bb393053bc35ebd15 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-286e05cb367a427bb393053bc35ebd152020-11-25T04:00:35ZengUniversity of WarsawYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies1689-90242545-01152012-11-01575577Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White PaperAnna PiszczThe European Commission published a White Paper on 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of EU antitrust rules. The content of the White Paper is since then being prepared to be converted into EU legislation on private antitrust enforcement. This paper presents the developments in private antitrust enforcement in Poland after 2 April 2008. It commences with an outline of EU actions in this field which act as an introduction to the more detailed analysis of recent jurisprudential and legislative developments in Poland. The latter part of the paper covers, in particular, the 2009 Act on the Pursuit of Claims in Group Proceedings and the 2011 Act Amending the Civil Procedure Code and Some Other Acts which abolishes all specific elements of commercial proceedings, including the statutory ‘non-admission of evidence’ principle. These two legal acts are assessed in order to establish whether their introduction is likely to help facilitate private antitrust enforcement in Poland and to consider to what an extent are these developments responding to the challenges outlined by the European Commission.https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/55.pdfprivate enforcementbipolar system of enforcementquantification of harmfollow-on actionscollective redressnon-admission of evidenceconsultation document |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna Piszcz |
spellingShingle |
Anna Piszcz Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies private enforcement bipolar system of enforcement quantification of harm follow-on actions collective redress non-admission of evidence consultation document |
author_facet |
Anna Piszcz |
author_sort |
Anna Piszcz |
title |
Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper |
title_short |
Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper |
title_full |
Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper |
title_fullStr |
Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper |
title_full_unstemmed |
Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper |
title_sort |
still-unpopular sanctions: developments in private antitrust enforcement in poland after the 2008 white paper |
publisher |
University of Warsaw |
series |
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies |
issn |
1689-9024 2545-0115 |
publishDate |
2012-11-01 |
description |
The European Commission published a White Paper on 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of EU antitrust rules. The content of the White Paper is since then being prepared to be converted into EU legislation on private antitrust enforcement. This paper presents the developments in private antitrust enforcement in Poland after 2 April 2008. It commences with an outline of EU actions in this field which act as an introduction to the more detailed analysis of recent jurisprudential and legislative developments in Poland. The latter part of the paper covers, in particular, the 2009 Act on the Pursuit of Claims in Group Proceedings and the 2011 Act Amending the Civil Procedure Code and Some Other Acts which abolishes all specific elements of commercial proceedings, including the statutory ‘non-admission of evidence’ principle. These two legal acts are assessed in order to establish whether their introduction is likely to help facilitate private antitrust enforcement in Poland and to consider to what an extent are these developments responding to the challenges outlined by the European Commission. |
topic |
private enforcement bipolar system of enforcement quantification of harm follow-on actions collective redress non-admission of evidence consultation document |
url |
https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/55.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annapiszcz stillunpopularsanctionsdevelopmentsinprivateantitrustenforcementinpolandafterthe2008whitepaper |
_version_ |
1724449597751820288 |