Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper

The European Commission published a White Paper on 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of EU antitrust rules. The content of the White Paper is since then being prepared to be converted into EU legislation on private antitrust enforcement. This paper presents the developments in private antit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna Piszcz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2012-11-01
Series:Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/55.pdf
id doaj-286e05cb367a427bb393053bc35ebd15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-286e05cb367a427bb393053bc35ebd152020-11-25T04:00:35ZengUniversity of WarsawYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies1689-90242545-01152012-11-01575577Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White PaperAnna PiszczThe European Commission published a White Paper on 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of EU antitrust rules. The content of the White Paper is since then being prepared to be converted into EU legislation on private antitrust enforcement. This paper presents the developments in private antitrust enforcement in Poland after 2 April 2008. It commences with an outline of EU actions in this field which act as an introduction to the more detailed analysis of recent jurisprudential and legislative developments in Poland. The latter part of the paper covers, in particular, the 2009 Act on the Pursuit of Claims in Group Proceedings and the 2011 Act Amending the Civil Procedure Code and Some Other Acts which abolishes all specific elements of commercial proceedings, including the statutory ‘non-admission of evidence’ principle. These two legal acts are assessed in order to establish whether their introduction is likely to help facilitate private antitrust enforcement in Poland and to consider to what an extent are these developments responding to the challenges outlined by the European Commission.https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/55.pdfprivate enforcementbipolar system of enforcementquantification of harmfollow-on actionscollective redressnon-admission of evidenceconsultation document
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Piszcz
spellingShingle Anna Piszcz
Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
private enforcement
bipolar system of enforcement
quantification of harm
follow-on actions
collective redress
non-admission of evidence
consultation document
author_facet Anna Piszcz
author_sort Anna Piszcz
title Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper
title_short Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper
title_full Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper
title_fullStr Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper
title_full_unstemmed Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper
title_sort still-unpopular sanctions: developments in private antitrust enforcement in poland after the 2008 white paper
publisher University of Warsaw
series Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
issn 1689-9024
2545-0115
publishDate 2012-11-01
description The European Commission published a White Paper on 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of EU antitrust rules. The content of the White Paper is since then being prepared to be converted into EU legislation on private antitrust enforcement. This paper presents the developments in private antitrust enforcement in Poland after 2 April 2008. It commences with an outline of EU actions in this field which act as an introduction to the more detailed analysis of recent jurisprudential and legislative developments in Poland. The latter part of the paper covers, in particular, the 2009 Act on the Pursuit of Claims in Group Proceedings and the 2011 Act Amending the Civil Procedure Code and Some Other Acts which abolishes all specific elements of commercial proceedings, including the statutory ‘non-admission of evidence’ principle. These two legal acts are assessed in order to establish whether their introduction is likely to help facilitate private antitrust enforcement in Poland and to consider to what an extent are these developments responding to the challenges outlined by the European Commission.
topic private enforcement
bipolar system of enforcement
quantification of harm
follow-on actions
collective redress
non-admission of evidence
consultation document
url https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_7/55.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT annapiszcz stillunpopularsanctionsdevelopmentsinprivateantitrustenforcementinpolandafterthe2008whitepaper
_version_ 1724449597751820288