Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle

Introduction. During decades, milk production in the Nariño state has depended on the Holstein breed. For this reason, it is necessary to evaluate a model of milk production that allows to decrease production costs and in turn improves the compositional quality of the milk. Objective. This study ai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henry David Mogollón García, David Felipe Nieto Sierra, Edwin Castro-Rincón
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Costa Rica 2020-05-01
Series:Agronomía Mesoamericana
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/38541
id doaj-2864ac084b71441284915674913de8bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2864ac084b71441284915674913de8bf2020-11-25T02:10:43ZspaUniversidad de Costa RicaAgronomía Mesoamericana2215-36082020-05-0131210.15517/am.v31i2.38541Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattleHenry David Mogollón García0David Felipe Nieto Sierra1Edwin Castro-Rincón2São Paulo State UniversityCorporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA)Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA). Introduction. During decades, milk production in the Nariño state has depended on the Holstein breed. For this reason, it is necessary to evaluate a model of milk production that allows to decrease production costs and in turn improves the compositional quality of the milk. Objective. This study aimed to compare milk production and compositional quality of Holstein (HO) and the crossbreed between Kiwi Cross (KC) x HO. Materials and methods: Monthly milk production in HO cows (n=30) and the ones from the F1 of the KC x HO cross (n=40), was measured by adjusting the day in milk (DIM) and milk production by third of lactation, fat, protein and total solids. For the period between October 2016 and May 2017, 9,809 dairy production records were analyzed. Results: Maximum production was 25.8 ± 0.53 vs. 23.2 ± 0.53 l day-1 for HO vs. KC cows (p<0.05), respectively. The DIM was not different; however, in days 60, 90, 150, 180, 210 and 240 the HO group produced more milk than the KC group, with a persistence in the lactation peak until day 60, and from that point onwards milk production showed decreasing rates in both groups. Furthermore, the production per third of lactation was higher (p<0.05) in the first third compared to the second and third periods for HO (13.6±0.56 vs. 11.3±0.5723 and 9.9±0.47 l day-1, respectively) and KC (12.8±0.4505 vs. 10.6±0.66 and 9.5 ± 1.69 l day-1, respectively). Fat content was higher (p<0.05) in KC compared to HO in week one, three and five (4±0.07, 4±0.07, 4±0.07 vs. 3.6±0.12, 3.6±0.11, 3.7±0.09 %, respectively); likewise, protein in week one and four was higher in the KC group compared to HO (3.3±0.04 vs. 3.1±0.05 %; p<0.05). Total solids were 13.3±0.17 vs. 12.5±0.23% (p<0.05) for KC and HO cows, respectively in weeks two and five. Conclusion: Milk production in KC and HO was similar; however, KC improved performance in compositional milk quality, increasing the percentages of fat, protein and consequently, total solids. http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/38541animal performancecowsdairy cattlelactationmilk yield
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henry David Mogollón García
David Felipe Nieto Sierra
Edwin Castro-Rincón
spellingShingle Henry David Mogollón García
David Felipe Nieto Sierra
Edwin Castro-Rincón
Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle
Agronomía Mesoamericana
animal performance
cows
dairy cattle
lactation
milk yield
author_facet Henry David Mogollón García
David Felipe Nieto Sierra
Edwin Castro-Rincón
author_sort Henry David Mogollón García
title Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle
title_short Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle
title_full Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle
title_fullStr Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle
title_full_unstemmed Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle
title_sort productive performance of holstein and the crossbreding kiwi cross x holstein cattle
publisher Universidad de Costa Rica
series Agronomía Mesoamericana
issn 2215-3608
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Introduction. During decades, milk production in the Nariño state has depended on the Holstein breed. For this reason, it is necessary to evaluate a model of milk production that allows to decrease production costs and in turn improves the compositional quality of the milk. Objective. This study aimed to compare milk production and compositional quality of Holstein (HO) and the crossbreed between Kiwi Cross (KC) x HO. Materials and methods: Monthly milk production in HO cows (n=30) and the ones from the F1 of the KC x HO cross (n=40), was measured by adjusting the day in milk (DIM) and milk production by third of lactation, fat, protein and total solids. For the period between October 2016 and May 2017, 9,809 dairy production records were analyzed. Results: Maximum production was 25.8 ± 0.53 vs. 23.2 ± 0.53 l day-1 for HO vs. KC cows (p<0.05), respectively. The DIM was not different; however, in days 60, 90, 150, 180, 210 and 240 the HO group produced more milk than the KC group, with a persistence in the lactation peak until day 60, and from that point onwards milk production showed decreasing rates in both groups. Furthermore, the production per third of lactation was higher (p<0.05) in the first third compared to the second and third periods for HO (13.6±0.56 vs. 11.3±0.5723 and 9.9±0.47 l day-1, respectively) and KC (12.8±0.4505 vs. 10.6±0.66 and 9.5 ± 1.69 l day-1, respectively). Fat content was higher (p<0.05) in KC compared to HO in week one, three and five (4±0.07, 4±0.07, 4±0.07 vs. 3.6±0.12, 3.6±0.11, 3.7±0.09 %, respectively); likewise, protein in week one and four was higher in the KC group compared to HO (3.3±0.04 vs. 3.1±0.05 %; p<0.05). Total solids were 13.3±0.17 vs. 12.5±0.23% (p<0.05) for KC and HO cows, respectively in weeks two and five. Conclusion: Milk production in KC and HO was similar; however, KC improved performance in compositional milk quality, increasing the percentages of fat, protein and consequently, total solids.
topic animal performance
cows
dairy cattle
lactation
milk yield
url http://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/38541
work_keys_str_mv AT henrydavidmogollongarcia productiveperformanceofholsteinandthecrossbredingkiwicrossxholsteincattle
AT davidfelipenietosierra productiveperformanceofholsteinandthecrossbredingkiwicrossxholsteincattle
AT edwincastrorincon productiveperformanceofholsteinandthecrossbredingkiwicrossxholsteincattle
_version_ 1724917969283186688