Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib

Background: This study investigated whether the effectiveness of first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitors was associated with sites of disease in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive mRCC patients receiving first-line sorafenib (SO) or sun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo Grassi, Elena Verzoni, Luca Porcu, Roberto Iacovelli, Filippo de Braud, Giuseppe Procopio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-04-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Urology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287215571809
id doaj-2858968e7fc1484eb6c768d7fc7df28f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2858968e7fc1484eb6c768d7fc7df28f2020-11-25T03:43:01ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Urology1756-28721756-28802015-04-01710.1177/1756287215571809Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenibPaolo GrassiElena VerzoniLuca PorcuRoberto IacovelliFilippo de BraudGiuseppe ProcopioBackground: This study investigated whether the effectiveness of first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitors was associated with sites of disease in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive mRCC patients receiving first-line sorafenib (SO) or sunitinib (SU) was analyzed. Results: In total, 203 patients received SO and 99 SU. In patients with liver metastasis, SU was associated with a 18% higher risk of time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and a 39% higher risk of death than SO: conversely, patients without liver metastases who received SU showed a 46% decreased risk of TTF and 62% decreased risk of death. Conclusions: mRCC patients with liver metastases treated with first-line SO showed a better outcome compared with SU, while mRCC patients without liver metastases treated with first-line SU showed a better outcome compared with SO.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287215571809
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paolo Grassi
Elena Verzoni
Luca Porcu
Roberto Iacovelli
Filippo de Braud
Giuseppe Procopio
spellingShingle Paolo Grassi
Elena Verzoni
Luca Porcu
Roberto Iacovelli
Filippo de Braud
Giuseppe Procopio
Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
Therapeutic Advances in Urology
author_facet Paolo Grassi
Elena Verzoni
Luca Porcu
Roberto Iacovelli
Filippo de Braud
Giuseppe Procopio
author_sort Paolo Grassi
title Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
title_short Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
title_full Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
title_fullStr Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
title_full_unstemmed Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
title_sort sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Urology
issn 1756-2872
1756-2880
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Background: This study investigated whether the effectiveness of first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitors was associated with sites of disease in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive mRCC patients receiving first-line sorafenib (SO) or sunitinib (SU) was analyzed. Results: In total, 203 patients received SO and 99 SU. In patients with liver metastasis, SU was associated with a 18% higher risk of time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and a 39% higher risk of death than SO: conversely, patients without liver metastases who received SU showed a 46% decreased risk of TTF and 62% decreased risk of death. Conclusions: mRCC patients with liver metastases treated with first-line SO showed a better outcome compared with SU, while mRCC patients without liver metastases treated with first-line SU showed a better outcome compared with SO.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287215571809
work_keys_str_mv AT paolograssi sitesofdiseaseaspredictorsofoutcomeinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientstreatedwithfirstlinesunitiniborsorafenib
AT elenaverzoni sitesofdiseaseaspredictorsofoutcomeinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientstreatedwithfirstlinesunitiniborsorafenib
AT lucaporcu sitesofdiseaseaspredictorsofoutcomeinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientstreatedwithfirstlinesunitiniborsorafenib
AT robertoiacovelli sitesofdiseaseaspredictorsofoutcomeinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientstreatedwithfirstlinesunitiniborsorafenib
AT filippodebraud sitesofdiseaseaspredictorsofoutcomeinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientstreatedwithfirstlinesunitiniborsorafenib
AT giuseppeprocopio sitesofdiseaseaspredictorsofoutcomeinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientstreatedwithfirstlinesunitiniborsorafenib
_version_ 1724521923798368256