Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?

Summary: Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is important to maintain adequate nutrition in patients who have a non-functioning gastrointestinal tract. Our aim was to characterise patients receiving PN initiated in the intensive care unit (ICU) or the general wards. Methods: Data from patients wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Williams, S. Tu, C. Lodhia, G. Gu, G. Haar, J. O'Connor, O. Niewiadomski, T. Tandiari, A.J. Nicoll
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-04-01
Series:Clinical Nutrition Experimental
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352939318300782
id doaj-28576264d1dd41e4b7faaa2ac216f8cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28576264d1dd41e4b7faaa2ac216f8cb2020-11-24T21:36:40ZengElsevierClinical Nutrition Experimental2352-93932019-04-01247276Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?J. Williams0S. Tu1C. Lodhia2G. Gu3G. Haar4J. O'Connor5O. Niewiadomski6T. Tandiari7A.J. Nicoll8Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia; Corresponding author.Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacy, Eastern Health, Melbourne, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacy, Eastern Health, Melbourne, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacy, Eastern Health, Melbourne, AustraliaDepartment of Dietetics, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, AustraliaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, AustraliaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaSummary: Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is important to maintain adequate nutrition in patients who have a non-functioning gastrointestinal tract. Our aim was to characterise patients receiving PN initiated in the intensive care unit (ICU) or the general wards. Methods: Data from patients who received PN in two Australian hospital sites within a single health service between June and December 2016 (inclusive) was retrospectively collected. Demographics, cause for admission, indication and duration, and complications of PN were recorded. The latter included time to PN commencement, refeeding hypophosphataemia, biochemical liver dysfunction, hypoglycaemia and line sepsis. Results: Sixty-one patients received PN during this period. There was no delay between referral and commencing PN in ICU whilst seven (21.2%) ward patients were delayed by an average of 2.0 days (p = 0.01). Ward patients averaged 8.1 days of negligible oral intake compared with 4.3 days in ICU (p = 0.002). Complications were recorded in 19 (67.9%) ICU PN patients and 13 (39.4%) ward PN patients (p = 0.04). Refeeding hypophosphataemia was detected in three (9.1%) ward patients and six (21.4%) in ICU. There were eight (24.2%) cases of liver biochemical abnormality post commencing PN on the ward compared with 14 (50%) in ICU. There was no difference in hospital length of stay or survival between the groups. Conclusions: Patients receiving nutritional support initiated in the ICU were commenced on PN sooner than patients on the ward but experienced more complications. Ward patients experienced negligible oral intake for almost twice as long as ICU patients. Keywords: Parenteral nutrition, Intensive care unit, Ward, Malnutrition, Refeeding syndromehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352939318300782
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Williams
S. Tu
C. Lodhia
G. Gu
G. Haar
J. O'Connor
O. Niewiadomski
T. Tandiari
A.J. Nicoll
spellingShingle J. Williams
S. Tu
C. Lodhia
G. Gu
G. Haar
J. O'Connor
O. Niewiadomski
T. Tandiari
A.J. Nicoll
Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?
Clinical Nutrition Experimental
author_facet J. Williams
S. Tu
C. Lodhia
G. Gu
G. Haar
J. O'Connor
O. Niewiadomski
T. Tandiari
A.J. Nicoll
author_sort J. Williams
title Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?
title_short Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?
title_full Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?
title_fullStr Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?
title_full_unstemmed Parenteral nutrition: How do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?
title_sort parenteral nutrition: how do patients initiated in the intensive care unit differ from those on the ward?
publisher Elsevier
series Clinical Nutrition Experimental
issn 2352-9393
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Summary: Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is important to maintain adequate nutrition in patients who have a non-functioning gastrointestinal tract. Our aim was to characterise patients receiving PN initiated in the intensive care unit (ICU) or the general wards. Methods: Data from patients who received PN in two Australian hospital sites within a single health service between June and December 2016 (inclusive) was retrospectively collected. Demographics, cause for admission, indication and duration, and complications of PN were recorded. The latter included time to PN commencement, refeeding hypophosphataemia, biochemical liver dysfunction, hypoglycaemia and line sepsis. Results: Sixty-one patients received PN during this period. There was no delay between referral and commencing PN in ICU whilst seven (21.2%) ward patients were delayed by an average of 2.0 days (p = 0.01). Ward patients averaged 8.1 days of negligible oral intake compared with 4.3 days in ICU (p = 0.002). Complications were recorded in 19 (67.9%) ICU PN patients and 13 (39.4%) ward PN patients (p = 0.04). Refeeding hypophosphataemia was detected in three (9.1%) ward patients and six (21.4%) in ICU. There were eight (24.2%) cases of liver biochemical abnormality post commencing PN on the ward compared with 14 (50%) in ICU. There was no difference in hospital length of stay or survival between the groups. Conclusions: Patients receiving nutritional support initiated in the ICU were commenced on PN sooner than patients on the ward but experienced more complications. Ward patients experienced negligible oral intake for almost twice as long as ICU patients. Keywords: Parenteral nutrition, Intensive care unit, Ward, Malnutrition, Refeeding syndrome
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352939318300782
work_keys_str_mv AT jwilliams parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT stu parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT clodhia parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT ggu parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT ghaar parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT joconnor parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT oniewiadomski parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT ttandiari parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
AT ajnicoll parenteralnutritionhowdopatientsinitiatedintheintensivecareunitdifferfromthoseontheward
_version_ 1725940122011041792