Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?

This article presents a case study on the participation of activity-centered ergonomics researchers in a collaborative robot development research project. This empirical contribution is grounded in and framed by theoretical aspects relating to models of cooperation in a worker-robot system and to ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Flore Barcellini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche et Pratique sur les Activités 2020-04-01
Series:Activités
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/activites/5007
id doaj-2855066f850a40228ae366512dae5926
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2855066f850a40228ae366512dae59262021-09-02T11:27:03ZengAssociation Recherche et Pratique sur les ActivitésActivités1765-27232020-04-0117110.4000/activites.5007Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?Flore BarcelliniThis article presents a case study on the participation of activity-centered ergonomics researchers in a collaborative robot development research project. This empirical contribution is grounded in and framed by theoretical aspects relating to models of cooperation in a worker-robot system and to activity-centered ergonomics proposals relating to design project management. We therefore discuss: (1) the model of cooperation which is actually reified in the technology. Given the current potentialities of the technology, this model deals more with coordination than with cooperation, as it does not support dynamic management of the interdependence between worker-robot tasks; (2) the contributions and limits of the dual project management approach set up in the research consortium and in a factory. We stress that participation of ergonomists proved to be a necessary condition for designing a technology that potentially “preserves” health and performance; however, this participation was in no way sufficient as it did not support the future socio-organisational use of the technology. We conclude by highlighting ongoing research issues that focus on the aforementioned point by investigating decision-making processes relating to transitions towards a “Factory of the future” and to their supports, from political and historical-cultural perspectives.http://journals.openedition.org/activites/5007ergonomicsfactory of the futurecollaborative roboticsworkchange management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Flore Barcellini
spellingShingle Flore Barcellini
Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?
Activités
ergonomics
factory of the future
collaborative robotics
work
change management
author_facet Flore Barcellini
author_sort Flore Barcellini
title Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?
title_short Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?
title_full Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?
title_fullStr Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?
title_full_unstemmed Quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?
title_sort quelles conceptions de la coopération humains‑robots collaboratifs ?
publisher Association Recherche et Pratique sur les Activités
series Activités
issn 1765-2723
publishDate 2020-04-01
description This article presents a case study on the participation of activity-centered ergonomics researchers in a collaborative robot development research project. This empirical contribution is grounded in and framed by theoretical aspects relating to models of cooperation in a worker-robot system and to activity-centered ergonomics proposals relating to design project management. We therefore discuss: (1) the model of cooperation which is actually reified in the technology. Given the current potentialities of the technology, this model deals more with coordination than with cooperation, as it does not support dynamic management of the interdependence between worker-robot tasks; (2) the contributions and limits of the dual project management approach set up in the research consortium and in a factory. We stress that participation of ergonomists proved to be a necessary condition for designing a technology that potentially “preserves” health and performance; however, this participation was in no way sufficient as it did not support the future socio-organisational use of the technology. We conclude by highlighting ongoing research issues that focus on the aforementioned point by investigating decision-making processes relating to transitions towards a “Factory of the future” and to their supports, from political and historical-cultural perspectives.
topic ergonomics
factory of the future
collaborative robotics
work
change management
url http://journals.openedition.org/activites/5007
work_keys_str_mv AT florebarcellini quellesconceptionsdelacooperationhumainsrobotscollaboratifs
_version_ 1721176008642527232