Rectal, central venous, gastric and bladder pressures versus esophageal pressure for the measurement of cough strength: a prospective clinical comparison

• Main Authors: Lluís G. Aguilera, Lluís Gallart, Juan C. Álvarez, Jordi Vallès, Joaquim Gea
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2018-10-01
• Series: Respiratory Research
• Subjects: Respiratory muscles [A02.633.567.900]; Abdominal muscles [A02.633.567.050]; Cough [C23.888.852.293]; Laparotomy [E04.406]
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12931-018-0897-6

Abstract Background Cough pressure, an expression of expiratory muscle strength, is usually measured with esophageal or gastric balloons, but these invasive catheters can be uncomfortable for the patient or their placement impractical. Because pressure in the thorax and abdomen are expected to be similar during a cough, we hypothesized that measurement at other thoracic or abdominal locations might also be similar as well as useful in clinical scenarios. This study aimed to compare cough pressures measured at thoracic and abdominal sites that could serve as alternatives to esophageal pressures (P es ). Methods Nine patients scheduled for laparotomy were asked to cough as forcefully as possible from total lung capacity in supine position. Three cough maneuvers were performed while P es (the gold standard) as well as gastric, central venous, bladder and rectal pressures (P ga , P cv , P bl , and P rec , respectively) were measured simultaneously. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements in each patient at each site and evaluate agreement between alternative sites (P ga , P cv , P bl , and P rec ) and P es . Bland–Altman plots were used to compare Pes and the measurements at the other sites. Results Median (first quartile, third quartile) maximum pressures were as follows: P es 112 (89,148), P ga 105 (92,156), P cv 102 (91,149), P bl 118 (93,157), and P rec 103 (88,150) cmH2O. The ICCs showed excellent within-site repeatability of the measurements (p < 0.001) and excellent agreement between alternative sites and P es (p < 0.004). The Bland–Altman plots showed minimal differences between P es , P ga , P cv , and P rec . However, P bl was higher than the other pressures in most patients, and the difference between P es and P bl was slightly larger. Conclusions Cough pressure can be measured in the esophagus, stomach, superior vena cava or rectum, since their values are similar. It can also be measured in the bladder, although the value will be slightly higher. These results potentially facilitate the assessment of dynamic expiratory muscle strength with fewer invasive catheter placements in most hospitalized patients, thus providing an option that will be particularly useful in those undergoing thoracic or abdominal surgery. Trial registration NCT02957045 registered at November 7, 2016. Retrospectively registered.