WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)

The aim of this article is to describe semantic relations in the prepositions and the cognitive structures and mechanisms that contribute to the extension of the semantic networks of prepositions. The object of the study is cognitive structures and mechanisms, which we can see in grammar. The subjec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: О. В. Орленко
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: Odessa I. I. Mechnykov National University 2017-06-01
Series:Записки з українського мовознавства
Subjects:
Online Access:http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/131380
id doaj-2824eb40826a4c9e8e52db7c91168c86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2824eb40826a4c9e8e52db7c91168c862021-01-27T08:40:27ZbulOdessa I. I. Mechnykov National UniversityЗаписки з українського мовознавства2414-06272415-75622017-06-0112421522510.18524/2414-0627.2017.24.131380131380WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)О. В. Орленко0Національний університет «Львівська політехніка»The aim of this article is to describe semantic relations in the prepositions and the cognitive structures and mechanisms that contribute to the extension of the semantic networks of prepositions. The object of the study is cognitive structures and mechanisms, which we can see in grammar. The subject of the study is semantic networks of the Ukrainian prepositions vid and do. The primary prepositions provide such cognitive mechanisms as conceptual integration, metaphor and metonymy. The preposition do have more extensive semantic network. It has anthropocentric grounds as human orientation and direction of his/her movement physically is easier to identify on the basis of the opposed objects. In human perception of the world the source point is the very person, who requires profiling less often. The static↔dynamic opposition usually becomes relevant because of the context, but is not part of the conceptual content of preposition; therefore the category of goal is not crucial for prepositions.http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/131380прийменникобразна схематраєкторорієнтирсемантична мережакогнітивний механізм
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author О. В. Орленко
spellingShingle О. В. Орленко
WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)
Записки з українського мовознавства
прийменник
образна схема
траєктор
орієнтир
семантична мережа
когнітивний механізм
author_facet О. В. Орленко
author_sort О. В. Орленко
title WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)
title_short WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)
title_full WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)
title_fullStr WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)
title_full_unstemmed WHAT GRAMMAR SAYS ABOUT COGNITIVE MECHANISMS? (THE CASE OF PREPOSITIONS VID AND DO)
title_sort what grammar says about cognitive mechanisms? (the case of prepositions vid and do)
publisher Odessa I. I. Mechnykov National University
series Записки з українського мовознавства
issn 2414-0627
2415-7562
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The aim of this article is to describe semantic relations in the prepositions and the cognitive structures and mechanisms that contribute to the extension of the semantic networks of prepositions. The object of the study is cognitive structures and mechanisms, which we can see in grammar. The subject of the study is semantic networks of the Ukrainian prepositions vid and do. The primary prepositions provide such cognitive mechanisms as conceptual integration, metaphor and metonymy. The preposition do have more extensive semantic network. It has anthropocentric grounds as human orientation and direction of his/her movement physically is easier to identify on the basis of the opposed objects. In human perception of the world the source point is the very person, who requires profiling less often. The static↔dynamic opposition usually becomes relevant because of the context, but is not part of the conceptual content of preposition; therefore the category of goal is not crucial for prepositions.
topic прийменник
образна схема
траєктор
орієнтир
семантична мережа
когнітивний механізм
url http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/131380
work_keys_str_mv AT ovorlenko whatgrammarsaysaboutcognitivemechanismsthecaseofprepositionsvidanddo
_version_ 1724321808506683392