Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et al

Spagat and van Weezel have re-analysed the data of the University Collaborative Iraq Mortality Study (UCIMS) and found fatal weaknesses in the headline-grabbing estimate of 500,000 excess deaths presented, in 2013, by Hagopian et al. The authors of that 2013 paper now defend their estimate and this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Spagat, Stijn van Weezel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-02-01
Series:Research & Politics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018757858
id doaj-2812b78da5cd438fbcb37b63c10388a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2812b78da5cd438fbcb37b63c10388a12020-11-25T03:18:22ZengSAGE PublishingResearch & Politics2053-16802018-02-01510.1177/2053168018757858Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et alMichael Spagat0Stijn van Weezel1Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, UKSchool of Economics, University College Dublin, IrelandSpagat and van Weezel have re-analysed the data of the University Collaborative Iraq Mortality Study (UCIMS) and found fatal weaknesses in the headline-grabbing estimate of 500,000 excess deaths presented, in 2013, by Hagopian et al. The authors of that 2013 paper now defend their estimate and this is our rejoinder to their reply which, it is contended here, avoids the central points, addresses only secondary issues and makes ad hominem attacks. We use our narrow space constraint to refute some of the reply’s secondary points and indicate a few areas of agreement.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018757858
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Spagat
Stijn van Weezel
spellingShingle Michael Spagat
Stijn van Weezel
Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et al
Research & Politics
author_facet Michael Spagat
Stijn van Weezel
author_sort Michael Spagat
title Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et al
title_short Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et al
title_full Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et al
title_fullStr Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et al
title_full_unstemmed Terms and conditions still apply: A rejoinder to Hagopian et al
title_sort terms and conditions still apply: a rejoinder to hagopian et al
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Research & Politics
issn 2053-1680
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Spagat and van Weezel have re-analysed the data of the University Collaborative Iraq Mortality Study (UCIMS) and found fatal weaknesses in the headline-grabbing estimate of 500,000 excess deaths presented, in 2013, by Hagopian et al. The authors of that 2013 paper now defend their estimate and this is our rejoinder to their reply which, it is contended here, avoids the central points, addresses only secondary issues and makes ad hominem attacks. We use our narrow space constraint to refute some of the reply’s secondary points and indicate a few areas of agreement.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018757858
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelspagat termsandconditionsstillapplyarejoindertohagopianetal
AT stijnvanweezel termsandconditionsstillapplyarejoindertohagopianetal
_version_ 1724627036805267456