Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
I compared physical, chemical and biological characteristics of nine rivers running through three timber harvest regimes to investigate the effects of land use on river ecosystems, to determine whether these corresponded to changes linked with downstream location, and to compare the response of diff...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3434149?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-27f1aefce6824dd5b269974f75f6bb61 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-27f1aefce6824dd5b269974f75f6bb612020-11-25T01:01:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0179e4356110.1371/journal.pone.0043561Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.J Timothy WoottonI compared physical, chemical and biological characteristics of nine rivers running through three timber harvest regimes to investigate the effects of land use on river ecosystems, to determine whether these corresponded to changes linked with downstream location, and to compare the response of different types of indicator variables. Physical variables changed with downstream location, but varied little with timber harvest. Most chemical variables increased strongly with timber harvest, but not with downstream location. Most biological variables did not vary systematically with either timber harvest or downstream location. Dissolved organic carbon did not vary with timber harvest or downstream location, but correlated positively with salmonid abundance. Nutrient manipulations revealed no general pattern of nutrient limitation with timber harvest or downstream location. The results suggest that chemical variables most reliably indicate timber harvest impact in these systems. The biological variables most relevant to human stakeholders were surprisingly insensitive to timber harvest, however, apparently because of decoupling from nutrient responses and unexpectedly weak responses by physical variables.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3434149?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J Timothy Wootton |
spellingShingle |
J Timothy Wootton Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
J Timothy Wootton |
author_sort |
J Timothy Wootton |
title |
Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses. |
title_short |
Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses. |
title_full |
Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses. |
title_fullStr |
Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses. |
title_sort |
effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
I compared physical, chemical and biological characteristics of nine rivers running through three timber harvest regimes to investigate the effects of land use on river ecosystems, to determine whether these corresponded to changes linked with downstream location, and to compare the response of different types of indicator variables. Physical variables changed with downstream location, but varied little with timber harvest. Most chemical variables increased strongly with timber harvest, but not with downstream location. Most biological variables did not vary systematically with either timber harvest or downstream location. Dissolved organic carbon did not vary with timber harvest or downstream location, but correlated positively with salmonid abundance. Nutrient manipulations revealed no general pattern of nutrient limitation with timber harvest or downstream location. The results suggest that chemical variables most reliably indicate timber harvest impact in these systems. The biological variables most relevant to human stakeholders were surprisingly insensitive to timber harvest, however, apparently because of decoupling from nutrient responses and unexpectedly weak responses by physical variables. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3434149?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jtimothywootton effectsoftimberharvestonriverfoodwebsphysicalchemicalandbiologicalresponses |
_version_ |
1725210454805970944 |