Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.

I compared physical, chemical and biological characteristics of nine rivers running through three timber harvest regimes to investigate the effects of land use on river ecosystems, to determine whether these corresponded to changes linked with downstream location, and to compare the response of diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J Timothy Wootton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3434149?pdf=render
id doaj-27f1aefce6824dd5b269974f75f6bb61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27f1aefce6824dd5b269974f75f6bb612020-11-25T01:01:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0179e4356110.1371/journal.pone.0043561Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.J Timothy WoottonI compared physical, chemical and biological characteristics of nine rivers running through three timber harvest regimes to investigate the effects of land use on river ecosystems, to determine whether these corresponded to changes linked with downstream location, and to compare the response of different types of indicator variables. Physical variables changed with downstream location, but varied little with timber harvest. Most chemical variables increased strongly with timber harvest, but not with downstream location. Most biological variables did not vary systematically with either timber harvest or downstream location. Dissolved organic carbon did not vary with timber harvest or downstream location, but correlated positively with salmonid abundance. Nutrient manipulations revealed no general pattern of nutrient limitation with timber harvest or downstream location. The results suggest that chemical variables most reliably indicate timber harvest impact in these systems. The biological variables most relevant to human stakeholders were surprisingly insensitive to timber harvest, however, apparently because of decoupling from nutrient responses and unexpectedly weak responses by physical variables.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3434149?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J Timothy Wootton
spellingShingle J Timothy Wootton
Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
PLoS ONE
author_facet J Timothy Wootton
author_sort J Timothy Wootton
title Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
title_short Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
title_full Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
title_fullStr Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
title_sort effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and biological responses.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description I compared physical, chemical and biological characteristics of nine rivers running through three timber harvest regimes to investigate the effects of land use on river ecosystems, to determine whether these corresponded to changes linked with downstream location, and to compare the response of different types of indicator variables. Physical variables changed with downstream location, but varied little with timber harvest. Most chemical variables increased strongly with timber harvest, but not with downstream location. Most biological variables did not vary systematically with either timber harvest or downstream location. Dissolved organic carbon did not vary with timber harvest or downstream location, but correlated positively with salmonid abundance. Nutrient manipulations revealed no general pattern of nutrient limitation with timber harvest or downstream location. The results suggest that chemical variables most reliably indicate timber harvest impact in these systems. The biological variables most relevant to human stakeholders were surprisingly insensitive to timber harvest, however, apparently because of decoupling from nutrient responses and unexpectedly weak responses by physical variables.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3434149?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jtimothywootton effectsoftimberharvestonriverfoodwebsphysicalchemicalandbiologicalresponses
_version_ 1725210454805970944