Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?

This article describes an experiment to measure the impact of the Australasian “Health Star Rating” front of pack nutritional label system on consumer choice behaviour. This system presents a one-half to five star rating of nutritional quality via the front facings of food product packages. While th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Hamlin, Lisa McNeill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-06-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
FOP
TLL
HSR
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/8/6/327
id doaj-27f05b26956a46d69961911b62207ac9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27f05b26956a46d69961911b62207ac92020-11-24T21:11:50ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432016-06-018632710.3390/nu8060327nu8060327Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?Robert Hamlin0Lisa McNeill1Department of Marketing, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9001, New ZealandDepartment of Marketing, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9001, New ZealandThis article describes an experiment to measure the impact of the Australasian “Health Star Rating” front of pack nutritional label system on consumer choice behaviour. This system presents a one-half to five star rating of nutritional quality via the front facings of food product packages. While this system has been recently rolled out across Australasia, no test of its impact on food choice has been conducted. A sample of 1200 consumers was recruited on exit from supermarkets in New Zealand. A 2 × 2 factorial design was used with two levels of cold cereal product nutritional status (high, five star/low, two star) and two levels of the Health Star Rating label (present/absent). The dependent variable was revealed choice behaviour. The results indicated that the presence of the label had a significant depressive effect on consumer preference, but that this impact was not moderated in any way by the nutritional status expressed by the label. The result represents a significant functional failure of the Health Star Rating label in this research environment. The nature of the failure is consistent with the consumers processing the label in much the same way as the nominal brand cues that dominate the retail food packaging.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/8/6/327front of packnutrition labelhealth star ratingtraffic light labelFOPTLLHSR
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Hamlin
Lisa McNeill
spellingShingle Robert Hamlin
Lisa McNeill
Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?
Nutrients
front of pack
nutrition label
health star rating
traffic light label
FOP
TLL
HSR
author_facet Robert Hamlin
Lisa McNeill
author_sort Robert Hamlin
title Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?
title_short Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?
title_full Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?
title_fullStr Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Australasian “Health Star Rating” Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?
title_sort does the australasian “health star rating” front of pack nutritional label system work?
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2016-06-01
description This article describes an experiment to measure the impact of the Australasian “Health Star Rating” front of pack nutritional label system on consumer choice behaviour. This system presents a one-half to five star rating of nutritional quality via the front facings of food product packages. While this system has been recently rolled out across Australasia, no test of its impact on food choice has been conducted. A sample of 1200 consumers was recruited on exit from supermarkets in New Zealand. A 2 × 2 factorial design was used with two levels of cold cereal product nutritional status (high, five star/low, two star) and two levels of the Health Star Rating label (present/absent). The dependent variable was revealed choice behaviour. The results indicated that the presence of the label had a significant depressive effect on consumer preference, but that this impact was not moderated in any way by the nutritional status expressed by the label. The result represents a significant functional failure of the Health Star Rating label in this research environment. The nature of the failure is consistent with the consumers processing the label in much the same way as the nominal brand cues that dominate the retail food packaging.
topic front of pack
nutrition label
health star rating
traffic light label
FOP
TLL
HSR
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/8/6/327
work_keys_str_mv AT roberthamlin doestheaustralasianhealthstarratingfrontofpacknutritionallabelsystemwork
AT lisamcneill doestheaustralasianhealthstarratingfrontofpacknutritionallabelsystemwork
_version_ 1716752541771890688