A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake
Abstract Background Reviews of qualitative studies allow for deeper understanding of concepts and findings beyond the single qualitative studies. Concerns on study reporting quality led to the publication of the COREQ-guidelines for qualitative studies in 2007, followed by the ENTREQ-guidelines for...
Main Authors: | Y. de Jong, E. M. van der Willik, J. Milders, C. G. N. Voorend, Rachael L. Morton, F. W. Dekker, Y. Meuleman, M. van Diepen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01363-1 |
Similar Items
-
Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post-Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
by: Lorie A. Kloda
Published: (2009-09-01) -
Rehabilitation in patients with lymphoma: An overview of Systematic Reviews
by: Bhasker Amatya, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Author Engagement in the Literature Review of Research Articles Published in International and Iranian Local Journals: Some Insights from Appraisal Theory
by: Mohammad Naghizadeh, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews: Addressing Questions of Prevalence
by: Zachary Munn, et al.
Published: (2014-08-01) -
Evidence-based review in the field of developing critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies
by: Mehrnaz Ahmadi, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)