Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy

The article provides an analysis of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the interpretation of Articles 24 TEU, first paragraph, second subparagraph, and 275 TFEU governing the question of the Court’s jurisdiction in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joni Heliskoski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2018-08-01
Series:Europe and the World
Online Access:https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.03
id doaj-27e9b452ca2041a1b352b2deb75d3f7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27e9b452ca2041a1b352b2deb75d3f7b2020-12-15T17:28:44ZengUCL PressEurope and the World2399-28752018-08-0110.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.03Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security PolicyJoni HeliskoskiThe article provides an analysis of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the interpretation of Articles 24 TEU, first paragraph, second subparagraph, and 275 TFEU governing the question of the Court’s jurisdiction in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). The article first describes the background of those provisions as they resulted from the Convention on the Future of Europe and the 2003-4 and 2007 Intergovernmental Conferences and then compares the Court’s understanding of its jurisdiction to the drafting history of the provisions concerned. The main conclusion of the study of the case law suggests that the Court views its jurisdiction over the CFSP more broadly than the jurisdiction envisaged by the drafters of the Treaties. In particular, the Court both interprets the exclusion from its jurisdiction of acts based on the Treaty’s CFSP provisions in a narrow fashion and is prepared to review the legality of CFSP acts not only through direct actions but also through references for a preliminary ruling. However, the article argues that the provision of adequate legal protection in the field of the CFSP necessarily requires both the Court of Justice and domestic courts of the Member States to play their respective roles.https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.03
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joni Heliskoski
spellingShingle Joni Heliskoski
Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
Europe and the World
author_facet Joni Heliskoski
author_sort Joni Heliskoski
title Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
title_short Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
title_full Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
title_fullStr Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
title_full_unstemmed Made in Luxembourg: The fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the European Union in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy
title_sort made in luxembourg: the fabrication of the law on jurisdiction of the court of justice of the european union in the field of the common foreign and security policy
publisher UCL Press
series Europe and the World
issn 2399-2875
publishDate 2018-08-01
description The article provides an analysis of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the interpretation of Articles 24 TEU, first paragraph, second subparagraph, and 275 TFEU governing the question of the Court’s jurisdiction in the field of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). The article first describes the background of those provisions as they resulted from the Convention on the Future of Europe and the 2003-4 and 2007 Intergovernmental Conferences and then compares the Court’s understanding of its jurisdiction to the drafting history of the provisions concerned. The main conclusion of the study of the case law suggests that the Court views its jurisdiction over the CFSP more broadly than the jurisdiction envisaged by the drafters of the Treaties. In particular, the Court both interprets the exclusion from its jurisdiction of acts based on the Treaty’s CFSP provisions in a narrow fashion and is prepared to review the legality of CFSP acts not only through direct actions but also through references for a preliminary ruling. However, the article argues that the provision of adequate legal protection in the field of the CFSP necessarily requires both the Court of Justice and domestic courts of the Member States to play their respective roles.
url https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.03
work_keys_str_mv AT joniheliskoski madeinluxembourgthefabricationofthelawonjurisdictionofthecourtofjusticeoftheeuropeanunioninthefieldofthecommonforeignandsecuritypolicy
_version_ 1724382073893945344