Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation
Qualitative inquiry that commences with the concept, rather than the phenomenon itself, is subject to violating the tenet of induction, thus is exposed to particular threats of invalidity. In this symposium, using the examples of the concepts of uncertainty, trust, vulnerability and suffering, and i...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2002-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100403 |
id |
doaj-27d96cb9b13e4d3cbe4a02ab8e8e27cc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-27d96cb9b13e4d3cbe4a02ab8e8e27cc2020-11-25T03:26:29ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692002-12-01110.1177/16094069020010040310.1177_160940690200100403Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and InterpretationJanice M. MorseJudith E. HupceyJanice PenrodJude A. SpiersCharlotte PoolerCarl MitchamQualitative inquiry that commences with the concept, rather than the phenomenon itself, is subject to violating the tenet of induction, thus is exposed to particular threats of invalidity. In this symposium, using the examples of the concepts of uncertainty, trust, vulnerability and suffering, and interview and videotaped data, we discuss strategies to maintain the inductive thrust, and hence validity, during data analysis. The authors present the use of a skeletal framework and scaffold as techniques to “frame” the concept, while, at the same time, continuing to further develop the concept.https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100403 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Janice M. Morse Judith E. Hupcey Janice Penrod Jude A. Spiers Charlotte Pooler Carl Mitcham |
spellingShingle |
Janice M. Morse Judith E. Hupcey Janice Penrod Jude A. Spiers Charlotte Pooler Carl Mitcham Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
author_facet |
Janice M. Morse Judith E. Hupcey Janice Penrod Jude A. Spiers Charlotte Pooler Carl Mitcham |
author_sort |
Janice M. Morse |
title |
Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation |
title_short |
Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation |
title_full |
Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation |
title_fullStr |
Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity: Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation |
title_sort |
symposium introduction - issues of validity: behavioral concepts, their derivation and interpretation |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
issn |
1609-4069 |
publishDate |
2002-12-01 |
description |
Qualitative inquiry that commences with the concept, rather than the phenomenon itself, is subject to violating the tenet of induction, thus is exposed to particular threats of invalidity. In this symposium, using the examples of the concepts of uncertainty, trust, vulnerability and suffering, and interview and videotaped data, we discuss strategies to maintain the inductive thrust, and hence validity, during data analysis. The authors present the use of a skeletal framework and scaffold as techniques to “frame” the concept, while, at the same time, continuing to further develop the concept. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100403 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janicemmorse symposiumintroductionissuesofvaliditybehavioralconceptstheirderivationandinterpretation AT judithehupcey symposiumintroductionissuesofvaliditybehavioralconceptstheirderivationandinterpretation AT janicepenrod symposiumintroductionissuesofvaliditybehavioralconceptstheirderivationandinterpretation AT judeaspiers symposiumintroductionissuesofvaliditybehavioralconceptstheirderivationandinterpretation AT charlottepooler symposiumintroductionissuesofvaliditybehavioralconceptstheirderivationandinterpretation AT carlmitcham symposiumintroductionissuesofvaliditybehavioralconceptstheirderivationandinterpretation |
_version_ |
1724592527792668672 |