Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.
INTRODUCTION:Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting. METHODS:A cr...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4818037?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-27d4e28617d14761b6de3265d96dca1d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-27d4e28617d14761b6de3265d96dca1d2020-11-25T02:29:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01114e015208610.1371/journal.pone.0152086Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.Jaspal S TaggarTim ColemanSarah LewisMatthew JonesINTRODUCTION:Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting. METHODS:A cross-sectional mixed methods census survey of 418 HCPs from 59 inner-city practices (Nottingham, UK) was conducted between October-December 2014. Postal and web-surveys ascertained data on existing methods, knowledge, skills, attitudes, barriers and facilitators to AF screening using Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses, categorized according to HCP group, were summarized using proportions, adjusting for clustering by practice, with 95% C.Is and free-text responses using thematic analysis. RESULTS:At least one General Practitioner (GP) responded from 48 (81%) practices. There were 212/418 (51%) respondents; 118/229 GPs, 67/129 nurses [50 practice nurses; 17 Nurse Practitioners (NPs)], 27/60 healthcare assistants (HCAs). 39/48 (81%) practices had an ECG machine and diagnosed AF in-house. Non-GP HCPs reported having less knowledge about ECG interpretation, diagnosing and treating AF than GPs. A greater proportion of non-GP HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training specifically for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion (95% CI) GPs: 11.9% (6.8-20.0); HCAs: 37.0% (21.7-55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0-59.0); NPs 41.2% (21.9-63.7)]. Barriers included time, workload and capacity to undertake screening activities, although training to diagnose and manage AF was a required facilitator. CONCLUSION:Inner-city general practices were found to have adequate access to resources for AF screening. There is enthusiasm by non-GP HCPs to up-skill in the diagnosis and management of AF and they may have a role in future AF screening. However, organisational barriers, such as lack of time, staff and capacity, should be overcome for AF screening to be feasibly implemented within primary care.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4818037?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jaspal S Taggar Tim Coleman Sarah Lewis Matthew Jones |
spellingShingle |
Jaspal S Taggar Tim Coleman Sarah Lewis Matthew Jones Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jaspal S Taggar Tim Coleman Sarah Lewis Matthew Jones |
author_sort |
Jaspal S Taggar |
title |
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care. |
title_short |
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care. |
title_full |
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care. |
title_fullStr |
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care. |
title_sort |
screening for atrial fibrillation--a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals in primary care. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
INTRODUCTION:Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting. METHODS:A cross-sectional mixed methods census survey of 418 HCPs from 59 inner-city practices (Nottingham, UK) was conducted between October-December 2014. Postal and web-surveys ascertained data on existing methods, knowledge, skills, attitudes, barriers and facilitators to AF screening using Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses, categorized according to HCP group, were summarized using proportions, adjusting for clustering by practice, with 95% C.Is and free-text responses using thematic analysis. RESULTS:At least one General Practitioner (GP) responded from 48 (81%) practices. There were 212/418 (51%) respondents; 118/229 GPs, 67/129 nurses [50 practice nurses; 17 Nurse Practitioners (NPs)], 27/60 healthcare assistants (HCAs). 39/48 (81%) practices had an ECG machine and diagnosed AF in-house. Non-GP HCPs reported having less knowledge about ECG interpretation, diagnosing and treating AF than GPs. A greater proportion of non-GP HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training specifically for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion (95% CI) GPs: 11.9% (6.8-20.0); HCAs: 37.0% (21.7-55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0-59.0); NPs 41.2% (21.9-63.7)]. Barriers included time, workload and capacity to undertake screening activities, although training to diagnose and manage AF was a required facilitator. CONCLUSION:Inner-city general practices were found to have adequate access to resources for AF screening. There is enthusiasm by non-GP HCPs to up-skill in the diagnosis and management of AF and they may have a role in future AF screening. However, organisational barriers, such as lack of time, staff and capacity, should be overcome for AF screening to be feasibly implemented within primary care. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4818037?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jaspalstaggar screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare AT timcoleman screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare AT sarahlewis screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare AT matthewjones screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare |
_version_ |
1724833986200469504 |