Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.

INTRODUCTION:Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting. METHODS:A cr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaspal S Taggar, Tim Coleman, Sarah Lewis, Matthew Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4818037?pdf=render
id doaj-27d4e28617d14761b6de3265d96dca1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27d4e28617d14761b6de3265d96dca1d2020-11-25T02:29:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01114e015208610.1371/journal.pone.0152086Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.Jaspal S TaggarTim ColemanSarah LewisMatthew JonesINTRODUCTION:Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting. METHODS:A cross-sectional mixed methods census survey of 418 HCPs from 59 inner-city practices (Nottingham, UK) was conducted between October-December 2014. Postal and web-surveys ascertained data on existing methods, knowledge, skills, attitudes, barriers and facilitators to AF screening using Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses, categorized according to HCP group, were summarized using proportions, adjusting for clustering by practice, with 95% C.Is and free-text responses using thematic analysis. RESULTS:At least one General Practitioner (GP) responded from 48 (81%) practices. There were 212/418 (51%) respondents; 118/229 GPs, 67/129 nurses [50 practice nurses; 17 Nurse Practitioners (NPs)], 27/60 healthcare assistants (HCAs). 39/48 (81%) practices had an ECG machine and diagnosed AF in-house. Non-GP HCPs reported having less knowledge about ECG interpretation, diagnosing and treating AF than GPs. A greater proportion of non-GP HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training specifically for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion (95% CI) GPs: 11.9% (6.8-20.0); HCAs: 37.0% (21.7-55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0-59.0); NPs 41.2% (21.9-63.7)]. Barriers included time, workload and capacity to undertake screening activities, although training to diagnose and manage AF was a required facilitator. CONCLUSION:Inner-city general practices were found to have adequate access to resources for AF screening. There is enthusiasm by non-GP HCPs to up-skill in the diagnosis and management of AF and they may have a role in future AF screening. However, organisational barriers, such as lack of time, staff and capacity, should be overcome for AF screening to be feasibly implemented within primary care.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4818037?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaspal S Taggar
Tim Coleman
Sarah Lewis
Matthew Jones
spellingShingle Jaspal S Taggar
Tim Coleman
Sarah Lewis
Matthew Jones
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jaspal S Taggar
Tim Coleman
Sarah Lewis
Matthew Jones
author_sort Jaspal S Taggar
title Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.
title_short Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.
title_full Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.
title_fullStr Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Atrial Fibrillation--A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.
title_sort screening for atrial fibrillation--a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals in primary care.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting. METHODS:A cross-sectional mixed methods census survey of 418 HCPs from 59 inner-city practices (Nottingham, UK) was conducted between October-December 2014. Postal and web-surveys ascertained data on existing methods, knowledge, skills, attitudes, barriers and facilitators to AF screening using Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses, categorized according to HCP group, were summarized using proportions, adjusting for clustering by practice, with 95% C.Is and free-text responses using thematic analysis. RESULTS:At least one General Practitioner (GP) responded from 48 (81%) practices. There were 212/418 (51%) respondents; 118/229 GPs, 67/129 nurses [50 practice nurses; 17 Nurse Practitioners (NPs)], 27/60 healthcare assistants (HCAs). 39/48 (81%) practices had an ECG machine and diagnosed AF in-house. Non-GP HCPs reported having less knowledge about ECG interpretation, diagnosing and treating AF than GPs. A greater proportion of non-GP HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training specifically for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion (95% CI) GPs: 11.9% (6.8-20.0); HCAs: 37.0% (21.7-55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0-59.0); NPs 41.2% (21.9-63.7)]. Barriers included time, workload and capacity to undertake screening activities, although training to diagnose and manage AF was a required facilitator. CONCLUSION:Inner-city general practices were found to have adequate access to resources for AF screening. There is enthusiasm by non-GP HCPs to up-skill in the diagnosis and management of AF and they may have a role in future AF screening. However, organisational barriers, such as lack of time, staff and capacity, should be overcome for AF screening to be feasibly implemented within primary care.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4818037?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jaspalstaggar screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare
AT timcoleman screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare
AT sarahlewis screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare
AT matthewjones screeningforatrialfibrillationacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinprimarycare
_version_ 1724833986200469504