Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCR

Faecal samples were collected from 224 dogs (47 villages) in Ankara. Toxocara spp. eggs were diagnosed in faeces using centrifugal flotation and sedimentation methods. A total of 21 dogs (9.38 %) were positive for Toxocara spp. eggs. In this study, we used the PCR technique that, in combination with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Öge H., Öge S., Özbakiş-Beceriklisoy G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-06-01
Series:Helminthologia
Subjects:
dog
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2019-0008
id doaj-27d3a471a81442e28026a3db6515cea5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27d3a471a81442e28026a3db6515cea52021-09-06T19:22:16ZengSciendoHelminthologia0440-66051336-90832019-06-0156211812310.2478/helm-2019-0008helm-2019-0008Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCRÖge H.0Öge S.1Özbakiş-Beceriklisoy G.2Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Ankara, TurkeyAnkara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Ankara, TurkeyAnkara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Ankara, TurkeyFaecal samples were collected from 224 dogs (47 villages) in Ankara. Toxocara spp. eggs were diagnosed in faeces using centrifugal flotation and sedimentation methods. A total of 21 dogs (9.38 %) were positive for Toxocara spp. eggs. In this study, we used the PCR technique that, in combination with DNA sequencing, allows the detection and identification of T.canis eggs in faeces of infected dogs. For this purpose, the ATPase subunit-6 gene (mtDNA) was selected as a target for the amplification T. canis. The primers were used to amplify 217 bp region. Amongst 21 coproscopically detected Toxocara isolates from dogs, 5 (23.8 %) samples were PCR-positive for T. canis, and the remaining 16 samples were PCR-negative. Results indicate that PCR can detect Toxocara canis DNA in faeces of infected dogs, but efficacy was low when compare to sedimentation/flotation. PCR is additional test for diagnosing of this infection. But, the difficulties of identification based on PCR in faecal examinations need to be investigated further.https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2019-0008toxocara canisdogfaecal examinationatpase subunit-6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Öge H.
Öge S.
Özbakiş-Beceriklisoy G.
spellingShingle Öge H.
Öge S.
Özbakiş-Beceriklisoy G.
Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCR
Helminthologia
toxocara canis
dog
faecal examination
atpase subunit-6
author_facet Öge H.
Öge S.
Özbakiş-Beceriklisoy G.
author_sort Öge H.
title Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCR
title_short Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCR
title_full Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCR
title_fullStr Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCR
title_full_unstemmed Detection and identification of Toxocara canis in infected dogs using PCR
title_sort detection and identification of toxocara canis in infected dogs using pcr
publisher Sciendo
series Helminthologia
issn 0440-6605
1336-9083
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Faecal samples were collected from 224 dogs (47 villages) in Ankara. Toxocara spp. eggs were diagnosed in faeces using centrifugal flotation and sedimentation methods. A total of 21 dogs (9.38 %) were positive for Toxocara spp. eggs. In this study, we used the PCR technique that, in combination with DNA sequencing, allows the detection and identification of T.canis eggs in faeces of infected dogs. For this purpose, the ATPase subunit-6 gene (mtDNA) was selected as a target for the amplification T. canis. The primers were used to amplify 217 bp region. Amongst 21 coproscopically detected Toxocara isolates from dogs, 5 (23.8 %) samples were PCR-positive for T. canis, and the remaining 16 samples were PCR-negative. Results indicate that PCR can detect Toxocara canis DNA in faeces of infected dogs, but efficacy was low when compare to sedimentation/flotation. PCR is additional test for diagnosing of this infection. But, the difficulties of identification based on PCR in faecal examinations need to be investigated further.
topic toxocara canis
dog
faecal examination
atpase subunit-6
url https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2019-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT ogeh detectionandidentificationoftoxocaracanisininfecteddogsusingpcr
AT oges detectionandidentificationoftoxocaracanisininfecteddogsusingpcr
AT ozbakisbeceriklisoyg detectionandidentificationoftoxocaracanisininfecteddogsusingpcr
_version_ 1717772329972400128