Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives

In the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources, and about 43% of tenant households were cost burdened. Local governments are in a unique position to facilitate green affordable housing, that could reduce cost burdens, environmental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armin Jeddi Yeganeh, Andrew Patton McCoy, Steve Hankey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6269
id doaj-27d0af61c9524b27832df12af128ce5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27d0af61c9524b27832df12af128ce5c2020-11-25T00:05:32ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-11-011122626910.3390/su11226269su11226269Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning IncentivesArmin Jeddi Yeganeh0Andrew Patton McCoy1Steve Hankey2The Myers-Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAThe Myers-Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USASchool of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAIn the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources, and about 43% of tenant households were cost burdened. Local governments are in a unique position to facilitate green affordable housing, that could reduce cost burdens, environmental degradation, and environmental injustice. Nonetheless, limited studies have made progress on the costs and benefits of green affordable housing, to guide decision-making, particularly in small communities. This study investigates density bonus options for green affordable housing by analyzing construction costs, transaction prices, and spillover effects of green certifications and affordable housing units. The authors employ pooled cross-sectional construction cost and price data from 422 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects and 11,016 Multiple Listing Service (MLS) transactions in Virginia. Using hedonic regression analyses controlling for mediating factors, the study finds that the new construction of market-rate green certified houses is associated with small upfront costs, but large and statistically significant price premiums. In addition, the construction of market-rate green certified houses has large and statistically significant spillover effects on existing non-certified houses. Existing non-certified affordable housing units show small and often insignificant negative price impacts on the transaction prices of surrounding properties. The study concludes that the magnitude of social benefits associated with green building justifies the local provision of voluntary programs for green affordable housing, where housing is expensive relative to its basic cost of production.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6269density incentiveearthcraftenergystargreen premiumhedonic pricinglihtcrehabilitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Armin Jeddi Yeganeh
Andrew Patton McCoy
Steve Hankey
spellingShingle Armin Jeddi Yeganeh
Andrew Patton McCoy
Steve Hankey
Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives
Sustainability
density incentive
earthcraft
energystar
green premium
hedonic pricing
lihtc
rehabilitation
author_facet Armin Jeddi Yeganeh
Andrew Patton McCoy
Steve Hankey
author_sort Armin Jeddi Yeganeh
title Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives
title_short Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives
title_full Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives
title_fullStr Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives
title_full_unstemmed Green Affordable Housing: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Zoning Incentives
title_sort green affordable housing: cost-benefit analysis for zoning incentives
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-11-01
description In the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources, and about 43% of tenant households were cost burdened. Local governments are in a unique position to facilitate green affordable housing, that could reduce cost burdens, environmental degradation, and environmental injustice. Nonetheless, limited studies have made progress on the costs and benefits of green affordable housing, to guide decision-making, particularly in small communities. This study investigates density bonus options for green affordable housing by analyzing construction costs, transaction prices, and spillover effects of green certifications and affordable housing units. The authors employ pooled cross-sectional construction cost and price data from 422 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects and 11,016 Multiple Listing Service (MLS) transactions in Virginia. Using hedonic regression analyses controlling for mediating factors, the study finds that the new construction of market-rate green certified houses is associated with small upfront costs, but large and statistically significant price premiums. In addition, the construction of market-rate green certified houses has large and statistically significant spillover effects on existing non-certified houses. Existing non-certified affordable housing units show small and often insignificant negative price impacts on the transaction prices of surrounding properties. The study concludes that the magnitude of social benefits associated with green building justifies the local provision of voluntary programs for green affordable housing, where housing is expensive relative to its basic cost of production.
topic density incentive
earthcraft
energystar
green premium
hedonic pricing
lihtc
rehabilitation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6269
work_keys_str_mv AT arminjeddiyeganeh greenaffordablehousingcostbenefitanalysisforzoningincentives
AT andrewpattonmccoy greenaffordablehousingcostbenefitanalysisforzoningincentives
AT stevehankey greenaffordablehousingcostbenefitanalysisforzoningincentives
_version_ 1725424768439549952