Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles

Context: High-intensity light emitting diode lamps with reduced exposure time to bond orthodontic attachments have been introduced to save the valuable clinical time. Aims: To evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets cured using three different light emitting diode curing units having different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Priyanka Verma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2016;volume=27;issue=2;spage=168;epage=173;aulast=Verma
id doaj-27cf1d62d2854167aefac7806ca037b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27cf1d62d2854167aefac7806ca037b72020-11-24T22:12:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032016-01-0127216817310.4103/0970-9290.183134Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profilesPriyanka VermaContext: High-intensity light emitting diode lamps with reduced exposure time to bond orthodontic attachments have been introduced to save the valuable clinical time. Aims: To evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets cured using three different light emitting diode curing units having different intensities and curing times, to compare the effect of different exposure methods on bond strength, and to compare the amount of remnant adhesive on tooth after debonding. Settings and Design: Study conducted on 120 brackets bonded to extracted premolar teeth cured by using three light-emitting diode (LED) units. Methods: One hundred and twenty adhesive precoated metal brackets (Gemini series, 3M Unitek) were cured using three LED curing units (3M ESPE, ELIPAR, S10; Ortholux™ LED; Ortholux™ Luminous Curing Light). Universal testing machine was used to record shear bond strength. Residual adhesive remaining on the teeth was assessed by the modified adhesive remnant index. Statistical Analysis: After calculating mean and standard deviation for each group, post hoc Tukey and Kruskal–Wallis tests were employed to find the significant difference. Results: Comparison showed highest shear bond strength for Group 1A followed by 3A and lowest for Group 3B. Statistically significant difference was noticed in comparing shear bond strength recorded in Group 1A, Group 2A, and Group 3A with Group 1B, Group 2B, and Group 3B. Conclusions: Reduction of exposure time to 6 s with high-intensity curing light seemed to be clinically acceptable and should be recommended. Curing of metal brackets with single exposure from buccal side showed lower shear bond strength values.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2016;volume=27;issue=2;spage=168;epage=173;aulast=VermaBond strengthenergy densitylight emitting diode
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Priyanka Verma
spellingShingle Priyanka Verma
Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Bond strength
energy density
light emitting diode
author_facet Priyanka Verma
author_sort Priyanka Verma
title Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles
title_short Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles
title_full Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles
title_fullStr Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles
title_full_unstemmed Curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles
title_sort curing efficiency of three light emitting diode units at different curing profiles
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Context: High-intensity light emitting diode lamps with reduced exposure time to bond orthodontic attachments have been introduced to save the valuable clinical time. Aims: To evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets cured using three different light emitting diode curing units having different intensities and curing times, to compare the effect of different exposure methods on bond strength, and to compare the amount of remnant adhesive on tooth after debonding. Settings and Design: Study conducted on 120 brackets bonded to extracted premolar teeth cured by using three light-emitting diode (LED) units. Methods: One hundred and twenty adhesive precoated metal brackets (Gemini series, 3M Unitek) were cured using three LED curing units (3M ESPE, ELIPAR, S10; Ortholux™ LED; Ortholux™ Luminous Curing Light). Universal testing machine was used to record shear bond strength. Residual adhesive remaining on the teeth was assessed by the modified adhesive remnant index. Statistical Analysis: After calculating mean and standard deviation for each group, post hoc Tukey and Kruskal–Wallis tests were employed to find the significant difference. Results: Comparison showed highest shear bond strength for Group 1A followed by 3A and lowest for Group 3B. Statistically significant difference was noticed in comparing shear bond strength recorded in Group 1A, Group 2A, and Group 3A with Group 1B, Group 2B, and Group 3B. Conclusions: Reduction of exposure time to 6 s with high-intensity curing light seemed to be clinically acceptable and should be recommended. Curing of metal brackets with single exposure from buccal side showed lower shear bond strength values.
topic Bond strength
energy density
light emitting diode
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2016;volume=27;issue=2;spage=168;epage=173;aulast=Verma
work_keys_str_mv AT priyankaverma curingefficiencyofthreelightemittingdiodeunitsatdifferentcuringprofiles
_version_ 1725803006377590784