Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator

abstract<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> The agreement between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi, Mahmoud Shahidi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Qom Islamic Azad University 2018-09-01
Series:سپهر سیاست
Subjects:
Online Access:http://se.journal.qom-iau.ac.ir/article_543908_e649273c8b24db02bc6931790d10fc9b.pdf
id doaj-27cc10db0e7f44fb83632c448a603aee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27cc10db0e7f44fb83632c448a603aee2020-11-25T02:16:37Zfas Qom Islamic Azad Universityسپهر سیاست2538-56742538-56742018-09-01516121143543908Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operatorMohsen Ameri Shahrabi0Mahmoud Shahidi1Assistant Prof., Faculty of Management, IAU, Naraq Branch, Naraq, Iran.Assistant Prof.,Faculty of Law,IAU, Naraq Branch, Naraq, Iran. (Corresponding Author)abstract<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> The agreement between Iran and the P5 + 1, especially the United States, is moderating the behavior of Iran, or can it-or should-it have to go through the process of material change? Basically, interactions in the context of social structures, on the one hand, and the purposes of the brokers on the other hand, should be considered, in addition to the role of social structural infrastructures, the role of superstructures, namely, the implications of government agents of 5 + 1, so that the most important "birth", that is, "agreement" between 5 + 1 and Iran. The explanation of this agreement shows, in essence, which aspects of co-ordination, cooperation, participation, or convergence have been raised? Here's the question of whether the continuation of Iran's cooperation with the West based on the role of social structures-along with the brokers-could be a kind of transition from Hobbesian logic to Lucky or, eventually, the Kantian anarchy? !http://se.journal.qom-iau.ac.ir/article_543908_e649273c8b24db02bc6931790d10fc9b.pdfnuclearagreementstructureiran's
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi
Mahmoud Shahidi
spellingShingle Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi
Mahmoud Shahidi
Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
سپهر سیاست
nuclear
agreement
structure
iran's
author_facet Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi
Mahmoud Shahidi
author_sort Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi
title Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
title_short Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
title_full Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
title_fullStr Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
title_full_unstemmed Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
title_sort ontology of iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
publisher Qom Islamic Azad University
series سپهر سیاست
issn 2538-5674
2538-5674
publishDate 2018-09-01
description abstract<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> The agreement between Iran and the P5 + 1, especially the United States, is moderating the behavior of Iran, or can it-or should-it have to go through the process of material change? Basically, interactions in the context of social structures, on the one hand, and the purposes of the brokers on the other hand, should be considered, in addition to the role of social structural infrastructures, the role of superstructures, namely, the implications of government agents of 5 + 1, so that the most important "birth", that is, "agreement" between 5 + 1 and Iran. The explanation of this agreement shows, in essence, which aspects of co-ordination, cooperation, participation, or convergence have been raised? Here's the question of whether the continuation of Iran's cooperation with the West based on the role of social structures-along with the brokers-could be a kind of transition from Hobbesian logic to Lucky or, eventually, the Kantian anarchy? !
topic nuclear
agreement
structure
iran's
url http://se.journal.qom-iau.ac.ir/article_543908_e649273c8b24db02bc6931790d10fc9b.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsenamerishahrabi ontologyofiransnuclearagreementand51fromthepointofviewoftherelationofthestructureoperator
AT mahmoudshahidi ontologyofiransnuclearagreementand51fromthepointofviewoftherelationofthestructureoperator
_version_ 1724890122429661184