Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator
abstract<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> The agreement between...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Qom Islamic Azad University
2018-09-01
|
Series: | سپهر سیاست |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://se.journal.qom-iau.ac.ir/article_543908_e649273c8b24db02bc6931790d10fc9b.pdf |
id |
doaj-27cc10db0e7f44fb83632c448a603aee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-27cc10db0e7f44fb83632c448a603aee2020-11-25T02:16:37Zfas Qom Islamic Azad Universityسپهر سیاست2538-56742538-56742018-09-01516121143543908Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operatorMohsen Ameri Shahrabi0Mahmoud Shahidi1Assistant Prof., Faculty of Management, IAU, Naraq Branch, Naraq, Iran.Assistant Prof.,Faculty of Law,IAU, Naraq Branch, Naraq, Iran. (Corresponding Author)abstract<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> The agreement between Iran and the P5 + 1, especially the United States, is moderating the behavior of Iran, or can it-or should-it have to go through the process of material change? Basically, interactions in the context of social structures, on the one hand, and the purposes of the brokers on the other hand, should be considered, in addition to the role of social structural infrastructures, the role of superstructures, namely, the implications of government agents of 5 + 1, so that the most important "birth", that is, "agreement" between 5 + 1 and Iran. The explanation of this agreement shows, in essence, which aspects of co-ordination, cooperation, participation, or convergence have been raised? Here's the question of whether the continuation of Iran's cooperation with the West based on the role of social structures-along with the brokers-could be a kind of transition from Hobbesian logic to Lucky or, eventually, the Kantian anarchy? !http://se.journal.qom-iau.ac.ir/article_543908_e649273c8b24db02bc6931790d10fc9b.pdfnuclearagreementstructureiran's |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi Mahmoud Shahidi |
spellingShingle |
Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi Mahmoud Shahidi Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator سپهر سیاست nuclear agreement structure iran's |
author_facet |
Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi Mahmoud Shahidi |
author_sort |
Mohsen Ameri Shahrabi |
title |
Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator |
title_short |
Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator |
title_full |
Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator |
title_fullStr |
Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator |
title_sort |
ontology of iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator |
publisher |
Qom Islamic Azad University |
series |
سپهر سیاست |
issn |
2538-5674 2538-5674 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
abstract<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator<br /> The agreement between Iran and the P5 + 1, especially the United States, is moderating the behavior of Iran, or can it-or should-it have to go through the process of material change? Basically, interactions in the context of social structures, on the one hand, and the purposes of the brokers on the other hand, should be considered, in addition to the role of social structural infrastructures, the role of superstructures, namely, the implications of government agents of 5 + 1, so that the most important "birth", that is, "agreement" between 5 + 1 and Iran. The explanation of this agreement shows, in essence, which aspects of co-ordination, cooperation, participation, or convergence have been raised? Here's the question of whether the continuation of Iran's cooperation with the West based on the role of social structures-along with the brokers-could be a kind of transition from Hobbesian logic to Lucky or, eventually, the Kantian anarchy? ! |
topic |
nuclear agreement structure iran's |
url |
http://se.journal.qom-iau.ac.ir/article_543908_e649273c8b24db02bc6931790d10fc9b.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mohsenamerishahrabi ontologyofiransnuclearagreementand51fromthepointofviewoftherelationofthestructureoperator AT mahmoudshahidi ontologyofiransnuclearagreementand51fromthepointofviewoftherelationofthestructureoperator |
_version_ |
1724890122429661184 |