“These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative Persuasion

Narrative persuasion, i.e., the impact of narratives on beliefs, behaviors and attitudes, and the mechanisms underpinning endorsement of conspiracy theories have both drawn substantial attention from social scientists. Yet, to date, these two fields have evolved separately, and to our knowledge no s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenzo Nera, Myrto Pantazi, Olivier Klein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00684/full
id doaj-27bffb8d6cec4daa8b868555d1d39ede
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27bffb8d6cec4daa8b868555d1d39ede2020-11-24T21:33:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-05-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00684330093“These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative PersuasionKenzo Nera0Myrto Pantazi1Olivier Klein2Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United KingdomCenter for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, BelgiumNarrative persuasion, i.e., the impact of narratives on beliefs, behaviors and attitudes, and the mechanisms underpinning endorsement of conspiracy theories have both drawn substantial attention from social scientists. Yet, to date, these two fields have evolved separately, and to our knowledge no study has empirically examined the impact of conspiracy narratives on real-world conspiracy beliefs. In a first study, we exposed a group of participants (n = 37) to an X-Files episode before asking them to fill in a questionnaire related to their narrative experience and conspiracy beliefs. A control group (n = 41) had to answer the conspiracy beliefs items before watching the episode. Based on past findings of both the aforementioned fields of research, we hypothesized that the experimental group would show greater endorsement of conspiracy beliefs, an effect expected to be mediated by identification to the episodes' characters. We furthermore hypothesized that identification would be associated with cognitive elaboration of the topics developed in the narrative. The first two hypotheses were disproved since no narrative persuasion effect was observed. In a second study, we sought to replicate these results in a larger sample (n = 166). No persuasive effect was found in the new data and a Bayesian meta-analysis of the two studies strongly supports the absence of a positive effect of exposure to narrative material on endorsement of conspiracy theories. In both studies, a significant relation between conspiracy mentality and enjoyment was observed. In the second study, this relation was fully mediated by two dimensions of perceived realism, i.e., plausibility and narrative consistency. We discuss our results, based on theoretical models of narrative persuasion and compare our studies with previous narrative persuasion studies. Implications of these results for future research are also discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00684/fullconspiracy theoriesconspiracy fictionconspiracy beliefsconspiracy mentalitynarrative persuasionExtended Elaboration Likelihood Model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenzo Nera
Myrto Pantazi
Olivier Klein
spellingShingle Kenzo Nera
Myrto Pantazi
Olivier Klein
“These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative Persuasion
Frontiers in Psychology
conspiracy theories
conspiracy fiction
conspiracy beliefs
conspiracy mentality
narrative persuasion
Extended Elaboration Likelihood Model
author_facet Kenzo Nera
Myrto Pantazi
Olivier Klein
author_sort Kenzo Nera
title “These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative Persuasion
title_short “These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative Persuasion
title_full “These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative Persuasion
title_fullStr “These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative Persuasion
title_full_unstemmed “These Are Just Stories, Mulder”: Exposure to Conspiracist Fiction Does Not Produce Narrative Persuasion
title_sort “these are just stories, mulder”: exposure to conspiracist fiction does not produce narrative persuasion
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Narrative persuasion, i.e., the impact of narratives on beliefs, behaviors and attitudes, and the mechanisms underpinning endorsement of conspiracy theories have both drawn substantial attention from social scientists. Yet, to date, these two fields have evolved separately, and to our knowledge no study has empirically examined the impact of conspiracy narratives on real-world conspiracy beliefs. In a first study, we exposed a group of participants (n = 37) to an X-Files episode before asking them to fill in a questionnaire related to their narrative experience and conspiracy beliefs. A control group (n = 41) had to answer the conspiracy beliefs items before watching the episode. Based on past findings of both the aforementioned fields of research, we hypothesized that the experimental group would show greater endorsement of conspiracy beliefs, an effect expected to be mediated by identification to the episodes' characters. We furthermore hypothesized that identification would be associated with cognitive elaboration of the topics developed in the narrative. The first two hypotheses were disproved since no narrative persuasion effect was observed. In a second study, we sought to replicate these results in a larger sample (n = 166). No persuasive effect was found in the new data and a Bayesian meta-analysis of the two studies strongly supports the absence of a positive effect of exposure to narrative material on endorsement of conspiracy theories. In both studies, a significant relation between conspiracy mentality and enjoyment was observed. In the second study, this relation was fully mediated by two dimensions of perceived realism, i.e., plausibility and narrative consistency. We discuss our results, based on theoretical models of narrative persuasion and compare our studies with previous narrative persuasion studies. Implications of these results for future research are also discussed.
topic conspiracy theories
conspiracy fiction
conspiracy beliefs
conspiracy mentality
narrative persuasion
Extended Elaboration Likelihood Model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00684/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kenzonera thesearejuststoriesmulderexposuretoconspiracistfictiondoesnotproducenarrativepersuasion
AT myrtopantazi thesearejuststoriesmulderexposuretoconspiracistfictiondoesnotproducenarrativepersuasion
AT olivierklein thesearejuststoriesmulderexposuretoconspiracistfictiondoesnotproducenarrativepersuasion
_version_ 1725954270422892544