Trans radial percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients (age 80 years or above) with acute coronary syndrome: Immediate and short-term outcome, a single centre experience

Trans radial percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients (age 80 years or above) with acute coronary syndrome: Immediate and short-term outcome, a single centre experience

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Vipin Thomas, Ali Shamsi, Ahmed Siddiqui, Abdulla Shehab, Jamil Gohar, Sultan Alkaram, Kamal Mohammed, Rajiv Gupta
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier 2017-11-01
Series:	Indian Heart Journal
Online Access:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217307101

Similar Items

Contrast induced nephropathy in very elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome
by: Vipin Thomas, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Immediate and in-hospital complications of percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Md. Toufiqur Rahman, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

The practical assessment of same-day discharge with scheduled trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Pu-Lin Hsieh, et al.
Published: (2011)

Immediate clinical and angiographic outcomes after delayed percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute coronary syndrome
by: S.D. Chevgun, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

Immediate Small Side Branch Occlusion after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
by: Mohammad Ali Ostovan, et al.
Published: (2007-10-01)

Immediate Small Side Branch Occlusion after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
by: Mohammad Ali Ostovan, et al.
Published: (2007-09-01)

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the very proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions
by: Teguh Santoso
Published: (1998-07-01)

Immediate and Long-Term Results of Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older
by: Bo Chen, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Is trans-radial approach related to an increased risk of radiation exposure in patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention? (The SAKARYA study)
by: Çağın Mustafa Üreyen, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Radial artery occlusion after primary percutaneous coronary interventions performed using different radial approaches
by: R. V. Akhramovich, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion via the radial artery
by: Mustafa Adem Tatlisu
Published: (2018-06-01)

Diagnosis, by Doppler echocardiography, of early complications in radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Lianet Rivero Seriel, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)

A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial and femoral approaches
by: Parameswara Reddy Medikonda, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Immediate versus deferred percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
by: Weijun Li, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Immediate Results and Six-Month Clinical Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
by: Fatemeh Behboudi, et al.
Published: (2011-03-01)

Immediate Results and Six-Month Clinical Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
by: Mohammad Hasan Namazi, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01)

Comparison of Clinical Value between Right Distal Radial Artery Access and Right Radial Artery Access in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
by: Wen Pan, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Percutaneous trans-ulnar versus trans-radial arterial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty, a preliminary experience at an Egyptian cardiology center
by: Mohammad Shafiq, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Very late stent thrombosis of bare-metal coronary stent nine years after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Đurić Predrag, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Left Radial Artery is Associated with Less Vascular Complications than Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through the Femoral Artery
by: Guoqing Qi, et al.

Left Distal Radial Artery Access Site in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe?
by: Elton Soydan, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Radial or femoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): Does the choice matters?
by: Mahesh Kumar Batra, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Comparison between femoral access versus radial access in primary percutaneous coronary interventions
by: Ahmed K A. G. Hassan
Published: (2021-01-01)

Feasibility and Safety of the Left Distal Radial Approach in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions
by: Oh-Hyun Lee, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Safety and feasibility of returning patients immediately to their originating hospitals after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Rahim Gul
Published: (2018-10-01)

Unsuitability of the radial artery as a bypass conduit after trans radial coronary angiogram
by: Harinder Singh Bedi
Published: (2016-03-01)

Trans-radial procedures in octagenarians with suspected coronary artery disease
by: V.S.R. Bhupal, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patient of acute coronary syndrome with intermediate lesion: Immediate & long term follow up
by: S. Gurmukhani, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Lessons from transulnar access for repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after radial artery occlusion
by: Xi-Le Bi, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Complex Large-Bore Radial percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale of the COLOR trial study protocol
by: Pierfrancesco Agostoni, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach
by: Tomasz Tokarek, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Naresh Rana, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Elective percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by coronary rupture
by: Carlos Galvão Braga, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

Elective percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by coronary rupture
by: Carlos Galvão Braga, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

The coronary collateral circulation in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Perera, Shyam Divaka
Published: (2007)

Is left main percutaneous coronary intervention justified in the presence of concomitant complex coronary artery disease – immediate and remote results – single Bulgarian center experience
by: Ivayla Zheleva-Kyuchukova, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Clinical and angiographic profile and in-hospital outcomes of elective percutaneous coronary interventions in very elderly patients
by: Swarajyam Veeramachaneni, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Trans (left) radial coronary interventions – A single centre experience
by: Col. R. Girish, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Sam J Lehman, et al.
Published: (2006-12-01)

Comment: Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Surender Deora, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_t92f2tsship2h5fiitfaqgrabs