Correction to: Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools
Abstract The authors wish to update information about the software DistillerSR in Tables 1 and 3 which we were alerted to following the publication of this article. In addition to the analysis provided, DistillerSR does support protocol development (Pi) e.g. assistance to determine appropriate PICO...
Main Authors: | Christian Kohl, Emma J. McIntosh, Stefan Unger, Neal R. Haddaway, Steffen Kecke, Joachim Schiemann, Ralf Wilhelm |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Environmental Evidence |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-018-0124-4 |
Similar Items
-
Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools
by: Christian Kohl, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Can systematic reviews inform GMO risk assessment and risk management?
by: Kohl, Christian, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Can systematic reviews inform GMO risk assessment and risk management?
by: Christian eKohl, et al.
Published: (2015-08-01) -
On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology
by: Neal R. Haddaway, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps
by: Neal R. Haddaway, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)