Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city.
Human cooperative behaviour, as assayed by decisions in experimental economic dilemmas such as the Dictator Game, is variable across human populations. Within-population variation has been less well studied, especially within industrial societies. Moreover, little is known about the extent to which...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3203179?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-276b05504c7344a4b3105b36611c73ed |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-276b05504c7344a4b3105b36611c73ed2020-11-25T02:15:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-01610e2692210.1371/journal.pone.0026922Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city.Daniel NettleAgathe ColléonyMaria CockerillHuman cooperative behaviour, as assayed by decisions in experimental economic dilemmas such as the Dictator Game, is variable across human populations. Within-population variation has been less well studied, especially within industrial societies. Moreover, little is known about the extent to which community-level variation in Dictator Game behaviour relates to community-level variation in real-world social behaviour. We chose two neighbourhoods of the city of Newcastle upon Tyne that were similar in most regards, but at opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of level of socioeconomic deprivation. We administered Dictator Games to randomly-selected residents, and also gathered a large number of more naturalistic measures of cooperativeness. There were dramatic differences in Dictator Game behaviour between the two neighbourhoods, with the mean allocation to the other player close to half the stake in the affluent neighbourhood, and close to one tenth of the stake in the deprived neighbourhood. Moreover, the deprived neighbourhood was also characterised by lower self-reported social capital, higher frequencies of crime and antisocial behaviour, a higher frequency of littering, and less willingness to take part in a survey or return a lost letter. On the other hand, there were no differences between the neighbourhoods in terms of the probability of helping a person who dropped an object, needed directions to a hospital, or needed to make change for a coin, and people on the streets were less likely to be alone in the deprived neighbourhood than the affluent one. We conclude that there can be dramatic local differences in cooperative behaviour within the same city, and that these need further theoretical explanation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3203179?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Nettle Agathe Colléony Maria Cockerill |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Nettle Agathe Colléony Maria Cockerill Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Daniel Nettle Agathe Colléony Maria Cockerill |
author_sort |
Daniel Nettle |
title |
Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. |
title_short |
Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. |
title_full |
Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. |
title_fullStr |
Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. |
title_sort |
variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
Human cooperative behaviour, as assayed by decisions in experimental economic dilemmas such as the Dictator Game, is variable across human populations. Within-population variation has been less well studied, especially within industrial societies. Moreover, little is known about the extent to which community-level variation in Dictator Game behaviour relates to community-level variation in real-world social behaviour. We chose two neighbourhoods of the city of Newcastle upon Tyne that were similar in most regards, but at opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of level of socioeconomic deprivation. We administered Dictator Games to randomly-selected residents, and also gathered a large number of more naturalistic measures of cooperativeness. There were dramatic differences in Dictator Game behaviour between the two neighbourhoods, with the mean allocation to the other player close to half the stake in the affluent neighbourhood, and close to one tenth of the stake in the deprived neighbourhood. Moreover, the deprived neighbourhood was also characterised by lower self-reported social capital, higher frequencies of crime and antisocial behaviour, a higher frequency of littering, and less willingness to take part in a survey or return a lost letter. On the other hand, there were no differences between the neighbourhoods in terms of the probability of helping a person who dropped an object, needed directions to a hospital, or needed to make change for a coin, and people on the streets were less likely to be alone in the deprived neighbourhood than the affluent one. We conclude that there can be dramatic local differences in cooperative behaviour within the same city, and that these need further theoretical explanation. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3203179?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielnettle variationincooperativebehaviourwithinasinglecity AT agathecolleony variationincooperativebehaviourwithinasinglecity AT mariacockerill variationincooperativebehaviourwithinasinglecity |
_version_ |
1724894580150632448 |