Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer remains the most common and second most deadly cancer diagnosed amongst U.S. men. External beam radiotherapy is a standard-of-care definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer and historically constituted an 8–9-week treatment course comprised of 39–45 doses of 1.8–2.0 G...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neil R. Parikh M.D., Amar U. Kishan M.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:American Journal of Men's Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320927241
id doaj-27660d586af640b1b9553b1444216f45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27660d586af640b1b9553b1444216f452020-11-25T03:23:47ZengSAGE PublishingAmerican Journal of Men's Health1557-98912020-06-011410.1177/1557988320927241Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate CancerNeil R. Parikh M.D.0Amar U. Kishan M.D.1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USADepartment of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, USAProstate cancer remains the most common and second most deadly cancer diagnosed amongst U.S. men. External beam radiotherapy is a standard-of-care definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer and historically constituted an 8–9-week treatment course comprised of 39–45 doses of 1.8–2.0 Gy each (conventional fractionation, CF). Based on the notion that prostate cancer may respond favorably to a higher dose per day, considerable research efforts have been focused on characterizing the safety and efficacy profile of shorter and shorter radiation courses. Ultrahypofractionation (UHF) involves condensing the radiation course into just 5–7 treatments of 6–8 Gy each. When utilizing modern techniques that allow the precise sculpting of a dose distribution that delivers high doses to the prostate and lower doses to surrounding normal tissues over five or fewer treatments, this treatment is called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Two randomized trials (HYPO-RT-PC and PACE-B) have compared UHF to longer radiation courses. The former demonstrated that UHF and CF have similar long-term toxicity and efficacy, while the latter demonstrated that modern SBRT has equivalent short-term toxicity as well. A separate report from a consortium of studies data provides prospective, albeit nonrandomized, data supporting the longer-term safety and efficacy of SBRT specifically. Thus, mounting high-level evidence suggests that SBRT is an acceptable standard care of option for men with localized prostate cancer.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320927241
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neil R. Parikh M.D.
Amar U. Kishan M.D.
spellingShingle Neil R. Parikh M.D.
Amar U. Kishan M.D.
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
American Journal of Men's Health
author_facet Neil R. Parikh M.D.
Amar U. Kishan M.D.
author_sort Neil R. Parikh M.D.
title Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
title_short Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
title_full Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
title_sort stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer
publisher SAGE Publishing
series American Journal of Men's Health
issn 1557-9891
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Prostate cancer remains the most common and second most deadly cancer diagnosed amongst U.S. men. External beam radiotherapy is a standard-of-care definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer and historically constituted an 8–9-week treatment course comprised of 39–45 doses of 1.8–2.0 Gy each (conventional fractionation, CF). Based on the notion that prostate cancer may respond favorably to a higher dose per day, considerable research efforts have been focused on characterizing the safety and efficacy profile of shorter and shorter radiation courses. Ultrahypofractionation (UHF) involves condensing the radiation course into just 5–7 treatments of 6–8 Gy each. When utilizing modern techniques that allow the precise sculpting of a dose distribution that delivers high doses to the prostate and lower doses to surrounding normal tissues over five or fewer treatments, this treatment is called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Two randomized trials (HYPO-RT-PC and PACE-B) have compared UHF to longer radiation courses. The former demonstrated that UHF and CF have similar long-term toxicity and efficacy, while the latter demonstrated that modern SBRT has equivalent short-term toxicity as well. A separate report from a consortium of studies data provides prospective, albeit nonrandomized, data supporting the longer-term safety and efficacy of SBRT specifically. Thus, mounting high-level evidence suggests that SBRT is an acceptable standard care of option for men with localized prostate cancer.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320927241
work_keys_str_mv AT neilrparikhmd stereotacticbodyradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT amarukishanmd stereotacticbodyradiotherapyforprostatecancer
_version_ 1724604653968031744