A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.

Novel typhoid diagnostics currently under development have the potential to improve clinical care, surveillance, and the disease burden estimates that support vaccine introduction. Blood culture is most often used as the reference method to evaluate the accuracy of new typhoid tests; however, it is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen L Storey, Ying Huang, Chris Crudder, Allison Golden, Tala de los Santos, Kenneth Hawkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4643909?pdf=render
id doaj-2756fbe7060e470ab31f770dcf6e11a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2756fbe7060e470ab31f770dcf6e11a92020-11-25T01:42:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014236410.1371/journal.pone.0142364A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.Helen L StoreyYing HuangChris CrudderAllison GoldenTala de los SantosKenneth HawkinsNovel typhoid diagnostics currently under development have the potential to improve clinical care, surveillance, and the disease burden estimates that support vaccine introduction. Blood culture is most often used as the reference method to evaluate the accuracy of new typhoid tests; however, it is recognized to be an imperfect gold standard. If no single gold standard test exists, use of a composite reference standard (CRS) can improve estimation of diagnostic accuracy. Numerous studies have used a CRS to evaluate new typhoid diagnostics; however, there is no consensus on an appropriate CRS. In order to evaluate existing tests for use as a reference test or inclusion in a CRS, we performed a systematic review of the typhoid literature to include all index/reference test combinations observed. We described the landscape of comparisons performed, showed results of a meta-analysis on the accuracy of the more common combinations, and evaluated sources of variability based on study quality. This wide-ranging meta-analysis suggests that no single test has sufficiently good performance but some existing diagnostics may be useful as part of a CRS. Additionally, based on findings from the meta-analysis and a constructed numerical example demonstrating the use of CRS, we proposed necessary criteria and potential components of a typhoid CRS to guide future recommendations. Agreement and adoption by all investigators of a standardized CRS is requisite, and would improve comparison of new diagnostics across independent studies, leading to the identification of a better reference test and improved confidence in prevalence estimates.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4643909?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helen L Storey
Ying Huang
Chris Crudder
Allison Golden
Tala de los Santos
Kenneth Hawkins
spellingShingle Helen L Storey
Ying Huang
Chris Crudder
Allison Golden
Tala de los Santos
Kenneth Hawkins
A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Helen L Storey
Ying Huang
Chris Crudder
Allison Golden
Tala de los Santos
Kenneth Hawkins
author_sort Helen L Storey
title A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
title_short A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
title_full A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
title_sort meta-analysis of typhoid diagnostic accuracy studies: a recommendation to adopt a standardized composite reference.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Novel typhoid diagnostics currently under development have the potential to improve clinical care, surveillance, and the disease burden estimates that support vaccine introduction. Blood culture is most often used as the reference method to evaluate the accuracy of new typhoid tests; however, it is recognized to be an imperfect gold standard. If no single gold standard test exists, use of a composite reference standard (CRS) can improve estimation of diagnostic accuracy. Numerous studies have used a CRS to evaluate new typhoid diagnostics; however, there is no consensus on an appropriate CRS. In order to evaluate existing tests for use as a reference test or inclusion in a CRS, we performed a systematic review of the typhoid literature to include all index/reference test combinations observed. We described the landscape of comparisons performed, showed results of a meta-analysis on the accuracy of the more common combinations, and evaluated sources of variability based on study quality. This wide-ranging meta-analysis suggests that no single test has sufficiently good performance but some existing diagnostics may be useful as part of a CRS. Additionally, based on findings from the meta-analysis and a constructed numerical example demonstrating the use of CRS, we proposed necessary criteria and potential components of a typhoid CRS to guide future recommendations. Agreement and adoption by all investigators of a standardized CRS is requisite, and would improve comparison of new diagnostics across independent studies, leading to the identification of a better reference test and improved confidence in prevalence estimates.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4643909?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT helenlstorey ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT yinghuang ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT chriscrudder ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT allisongolden ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT taladelossantos ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT kennethhawkins ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT helenlstorey metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT yinghuang metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT chriscrudder metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT allisongolden metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT taladelossantos metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
AT kennethhawkins metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference
_version_ 1725037957759369216