A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
Novel typhoid diagnostics currently under development have the potential to improve clinical care, surveillance, and the disease burden estimates that support vaccine introduction. Blood culture is most often used as the reference method to evaluate the accuracy of new typhoid tests; however, it is...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4643909?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-2756fbe7060e470ab31f770dcf6e11a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2756fbe7060e470ab31f770dcf6e11a92020-11-25T01:42:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014236410.1371/journal.pone.0142364A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.Helen L StoreyYing HuangChris CrudderAllison GoldenTala de los SantosKenneth HawkinsNovel typhoid diagnostics currently under development have the potential to improve clinical care, surveillance, and the disease burden estimates that support vaccine introduction. Blood culture is most often used as the reference method to evaluate the accuracy of new typhoid tests; however, it is recognized to be an imperfect gold standard. If no single gold standard test exists, use of a composite reference standard (CRS) can improve estimation of diagnostic accuracy. Numerous studies have used a CRS to evaluate new typhoid diagnostics; however, there is no consensus on an appropriate CRS. In order to evaluate existing tests for use as a reference test or inclusion in a CRS, we performed a systematic review of the typhoid literature to include all index/reference test combinations observed. We described the landscape of comparisons performed, showed results of a meta-analysis on the accuracy of the more common combinations, and evaluated sources of variability based on study quality. This wide-ranging meta-analysis suggests that no single test has sufficiently good performance but some existing diagnostics may be useful as part of a CRS. Additionally, based on findings from the meta-analysis and a constructed numerical example demonstrating the use of CRS, we proposed necessary criteria and potential components of a typhoid CRS to guide future recommendations. Agreement and adoption by all investigators of a standardized CRS is requisite, and would improve comparison of new diagnostics across independent studies, leading to the identification of a better reference test and improved confidence in prevalence estimates.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4643909?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Helen L Storey Ying Huang Chris Crudder Allison Golden Tala de los Santos Kenneth Hawkins |
spellingShingle |
Helen L Storey Ying Huang Chris Crudder Allison Golden Tala de los Santos Kenneth Hawkins A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Helen L Storey Ying Huang Chris Crudder Allison Golden Tala de los Santos Kenneth Hawkins |
author_sort |
Helen L Storey |
title |
A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference. |
title_short |
A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference. |
title_full |
A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference. |
title_fullStr |
A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference. |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference. |
title_sort |
meta-analysis of typhoid diagnostic accuracy studies: a recommendation to adopt a standardized composite reference. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Novel typhoid diagnostics currently under development have the potential to improve clinical care, surveillance, and the disease burden estimates that support vaccine introduction. Blood culture is most often used as the reference method to evaluate the accuracy of new typhoid tests; however, it is recognized to be an imperfect gold standard. If no single gold standard test exists, use of a composite reference standard (CRS) can improve estimation of diagnostic accuracy. Numerous studies have used a CRS to evaluate new typhoid diagnostics; however, there is no consensus on an appropriate CRS. In order to evaluate existing tests for use as a reference test or inclusion in a CRS, we performed a systematic review of the typhoid literature to include all index/reference test combinations observed. We described the landscape of comparisons performed, showed results of a meta-analysis on the accuracy of the more common combinations, and evaluated sources of variability based on study quality. This wide-ranging meta-analysis suggests that no single test has sufficiently good performance but some existing diagnostics may be useful as part of a CRS. Additionally, based on findings from the meta-analysis and a constructed numerical example demonstrating the use of CRS, we proposed necessary criteria and potential components of a typhoid CRS to guide future recommendations. Agreement and adoption by all investigators of a standardized CRS is requisite, and would improve comparison of new diagnostics across independent studies, leading to the identification of a better reference test and improved confidence in prevalence estimates. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4643909?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT helenlstorey ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT yinghuang ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT chriscrudder ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT allisongolden ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT taladelossantos ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT kennethhawkins ametaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT helenlstorey metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT yinghuang metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT chriscrudder metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT allisongolden metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT taladelossantos metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference AT kennethhawkins metaanalysisoftyphoiddiagnosticaccuracystudiesarecommendationtoadoptastandardizedcompositereference |
_version_ |
1725037957759369216 |