Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal window for collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods: Our prospectively collected institutional joint registry was queried for patients who underwent primary, unilateral TJA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Canfield, MD, Lawrence Savoy, BS, Mark P. Cote, DPT, Mohamad J. Halawi, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-03-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344119301402
id doaj-274dac869faa47ac849f3cd57d342cce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-274dac869faa47ac849f3cd57d342cce2020-11-25T01:43:58ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412020-03-01616267Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection windowMichael Canfield, MD0Lawrence Savoy, BS1Mark P. Cote, DPT2Mohamad J. Halawi, MD3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USACorresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. Tel.: +1 860 679 2200.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USABackground: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal window for collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods: Our prospectively collected institutional joint registry was queried for patients who underwent primary, unilateral TJAs. The primary outcomes were the net changes in WOMAC, SF-12 MCS, SF-12 PCS, OHS, KSCRS, and UCLA activity rating system at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were data acquisition costs and follow-up attrition rates. Results: Eight hundred sixty-six procedures (450 total hip arthroplasties, 416 TKAs) were analyzed. A consistent plateau in all PROMs was noted by 6 months postoperatively–except for SF-12 MCS which showed no significant changes at any time interval. For TKA, the percentage of overall improvement achieved by 6 months was 88.7%, 84.5%, 100%, and 90.5% for the WOMAC, SF-12 PCS, UCLA, and KSCRS, respectively. For total hip arthroplasty, these values were 92.7%, 83.5%, 88.0%, and 89.8% for WOMAC, SF-12 PCS, UCLA, and OHS, respectively. There were marginal improvements from 6 to 12 months and no improvement from 12 to 24 months. Follow-up rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 85%, 69%, and 40%, respectively. Our institutional costs for collecting a complete data set per patient were $128, $158, and $272 for 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: Most of the improvement in PROMs after primary TJA occurs within the first 6 months. In addition, limiting PROMs collection to 6 months appears to be cost-efficient owing to increased attrition rates beyond this time interval. Keywords: Patient-reported outcome measures, Arthroplasty, Timing, Hip, Kneehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344119301402
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Canfield, MD
Lawrence Savoy, BS
Mark P. Cote, DPT
Mohamad J. Halawi, MD
spellingShingle Michael Canfield, MD
Lawrence Savoy, BS
Mark P. Cote, DPT
Mohamad J. Halawi, MD
Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window
Arthroplasty Today
author_facet Michael Canfield, MD
Lawrence Savoy, BS
Mark P. Cote, DPT
Mohamad J. Halawi, MD
author_sort Michael Canfield, MD
title Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window
publisher Elsevier
series Arthroplasty Today
issn 2352-3441
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal window for collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods: Our prospectively collected institutional joint registry was queried for patients who underwent primary, unilateral TJAs. The primary outcomes were the net changes in WOMAC, SF-12 MCS, SF-12 PCS, OHS, KSCRS, and UCLA activity rating system at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were data acquisition costs and follow-up attrition rates. Results: Eight hundred sixty-six procedures (450 total hip arthroplasties, 416 TKAs) were analyzed. A consistent plateau in all PROMs was noted by 6 months postoperatively–except for SF-12 MCS which showed no significant changes at any time interval. For TKA, the percentage of overall improvement achieved by 6 months was 88.7%, 84.5%, 100%, and 90.5% for the WOMAC, SF-12 PCS, UCLA, and KSCRS, respectively. For total hip arthroplasty, these values were 92.7%, 83.5%, 88.0%, and 89.8% for WOMAC, SF-12 PCS, UCLA, and OHS, respectively. There were marginal improvements from 6 to 12 months and no improvement from 12 to 24 months. Follow-up rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 85%, 69%, and 40%, respectively. Our institutional costs for collecting a complete data set per patient were $128, $158, and $272 for 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: Most of the improvement in PROMs after primary TJA occurs within the first 6 months. In addition, limiting PROMs collection to 6 months appears to be cost-efficient owing to increased attrition rates beyond this time interval. Keywords: Patient-reported outcome measures, Arthroplasty, Timing, Hip, Knee
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344119301402
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelcanfieldmd patientreportedoutcomemeasuresintotaljointarthroplastydefiningtheoptimalcollectionwindow
AT lawrencesavoybs patientreportedoutcomemeasuresintotaljointarthroplastydefiningtheoptimalcollectionwindow
AT markpcotedpt patientreportedoutcomemeasuresintotaljointarthroplastydefiningtheoptimalcollectionwindow
AT mohamadjhalawimd patientreportedoutcomemeasuresintotaljointarthroplastydefiningtheoptimalcollectionwindow
_version_ 1725030533099945984