Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual Disability

Over the last 15 years, since introductionof the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)(Commonwealth Government of Australia,1992), there has been much discussionabout the extent and nature of buildingaccess for the disabled, particularly inresponse to proposed revisions to theBuilding Code of Australi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: L Castell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2012-11-01
Series:Construction Economics and Building
Online Access:https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2994
id doaj-274d1414953f4b129b6cda66aeb9379e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-274d1414953f4b129b6cda66aeb9379e2020-11-25T00:49:45ZengUTS ePRESSConstruction Economics and Building2204-90292012-11-018110.5130/AJCEB.v8i1.29941959Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual DisabilityL Castell0Curtin University of TechnologyOver the last 15 years, since introductionof the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)(Commonwealth Government of Australia,1992), there has been much discussionabout the extent and nature of buildingaccess for the disabled, particularly inresponse to proposed revisions to theBuilding Code of Australia (BCA) and theintroduction of a Premises Standardcovering building access. Much of theargument which contributed to the twoyear delay in submitting a final version ofthese documents for government approvalrelated to the extent of access provisionsand the burden of cost. The final versionsubmitted to government by the AustralianBuilding Codes Board (ABCB) (notreleased publicly) appears to still containinconsistencies between the DDA and theBCA in several areas such as wayfindingand egress.In the debate preceding submission of thefinal version there appears to have beenlittle reference to access requirements forindividuals with intellectual disability (ID).This may be due to a general lack ofresearch on the topic. Consequently, thispaper uses a combination of theknowledge gained from a limited numberof previous wayfinding studies, literaturedescribing general problems faced bythose with ID and the author’s personalexperience observing others with ID tocreate a list of probable difficulties andsuggested solutions. The paperconcludes with a discussion about theassociated cost implications and benefitsin providing the required access.https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2994
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L Castell
spellingShingle L Castell
Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual Disability
Construction Economics and Building
author_facet L Castell
author_sort L Castell
title Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual Disability
title_short Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual Disability
title_full Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual Disability
title_fullStr Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual Disability
title_full_unstemmed Adapting Building Design to Access by Individuals with Intellectual Disability
title_sort adapting building design to access by individuals with intellectual disability
publisher UTS ePRESS
series Construction Economics and Building
issn 2204-9029
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Over the last 15 years, since introductionof the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)(Commonwealth Government of Australia,1992), there has been much discussionabout the extent and nature of buildingaccess for the disabled, particularly inresponse to proposed revisions to theBuilding Code of Australia (BCA) and theintroduction of a Premises Standardcovering building access. Much of theargument which contributed to the twoyear delay in submitting a final version ofthese documents for government approvalrelated to the extent of access provisionsand the burden of cost. The final versionsubmitted to government by the AustralianBuilding Codes Board (ABCB) (notreleased publicly) appears to still containinconsistencies between the DDA and theBCA in several areas such as wayfindingand egress.In the debate preceding submission of thefinal version there appears to have beenlittle reference to access requirements forindividuals with intellectual disability (ID).This may be due to a general lack ofresearch on the topic. Consequently, thispaper uses a combination of theknowledge gained from a limited numberof previous wayfinding studies, literaturedescribing general problems faced bythose with ID and the author’s personalexperience observing others with ID tocreate a list of probable difficulties andsuggested solutions. The paperconcludes with a discussion about theassociated cost implications and benefitsin providing the required access.
url https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2994
work_keys_str_mv AT lcastell adaptingbuildingdesigntoaccessbyindividualswithintellectualdisability
_version_ 1725251344144531456