Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa

The US government proposes to impose tariffs on up to $50 billion of Chinese imports leading to significant concerns over the Trade War between the US and China. The article evaluates and examines the market responses of companies in both countries, depending on their direct and indirect exposures t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaehyung An, Alexey Mikhaylov, Ulf H. Richter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020325366
id doaj-274cdaf86d3a41828cb850c729ed443b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-274cdaf86d3a41828cb850c729ed443b2021-01-05T09:33:12ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402020-12-01612e05693Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in AfricaJaehyung An0Alexey Mikhaylov1Ulf H. Richter2College of Business, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, South KoreaFinancial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation; Corresponding author.Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, ChinaThe US government proposes to impose tariffs on up to $50 billion of Chinese imports leading to significant concerns over the Trade War between the US and China. The article evaluates and examines the market responses of companies in both countries, depending on their direct and indirect exposures to US-China trade. Moreover, this paper fills the gap in literature about deglobalization in Energy and Resources Sectors in Africa. This paper proves the idea that US companies that are more dependent on exports and imports from China have lower stock and bond returns, and, at the same time, higher default risks in the short time aspect. The article found Trade War effects in energy and resources companies in Africa in the last years: on ownership rank, on credit country rank, on default risks and on their profitability. The paper also demonstrates that companies’ indirect exposure to US-China trade through domestic input-output links affects their responses to news on the subject matter. These findings suggest that the state of US-China trade of energy and resources is much more complex than the simplistic view of global trade that was in the beginning of Trade War with China. As a result of the Trade War, the real changes in stock prices of China companies (-0.07%) in energy and resource sectors is less than the same changes in US companies in Africa (-0.32%) in 2019. Also, the probability of default of Chinese companies (average default probability changed in -0.08%) in energy and resource sectors changed less than the same rank of US companies in Africa (average default probability changed by -0.84%).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020325366EconomicsEnergyEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental managementStock returnsEvent study
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaehyung An
Alexey Mikhaylov
Ulf H. Richter
spellingShingle Jaehyung An
Alexey Mikhaylov
Ulf H. Richter
Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
Heliyon
Economics
Energy
Environmental economics
Environmental management
Stock returns
Event study
author_facet Jaehyung An
Alexey Mikhaylov
Ulf H. Richter
author_sort Jaehyung An
title Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_short Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_full Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_fullStr Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_sort trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in africa
publisher Elsevier
series Heliyon
issn 2405-8440
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The US government proposes to impose tariffs on up to $50 billion of Chinese imports leading to significant concerns over the Trade War between the US and China. The article evaluates and examines the market responses of companies in both countries, depending on their direct and indirect exposures to US-China trade. Moreover, this paper fills the gap in literature about deglobalization in Energy and Resources Sectors in Africa. This paper proves the idea that US companies that are more dependent on exports and imports from China have lower stock and bond returns, and, at the same time, higher default risks in the short time aspect. The article found Trade War effects in energy and resources companies in Africa in the last years: on ownership rank, on credit country rank, on default risks and on their profitability. The paper also demonstrates that companies’ indirect exposure to US-China trade through domestic input-output links affects their responses to news on the subject matter. These findings suggest that the state of US-China trade of energy and resources is much more complex than the simplistic view of global trade that was in the beginning of Trade War with China. As a result of the Trade War, the real changes in stock prices of China companies (-0.07%) in energy and resource sectors is less than the same changes in US companies in Africa (-0.32%) in 2019. Also, the probability of default of Chinese companies (average default probability changed in -0.08%) in energy and resource sectors changed less than the same rank of US companies in Africa (average default probability changed by -0.84%).
topic Economics
Energy
Environmental economics
Environmental management
Stock returns
Event study
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020325366
work_keys_str_mv AT jaehyungan tradewareffectsevidencefromsectorsofenergyandresourcesinafrica
AT alexeymikhaylov tradewareffectsevidencefromsectorsofenergyandresourcesinafrica
AT ulfhrichter tradewareffectsevidencefromsectorsofenergyandresourcesinafrica
_version_ 1724348296262057984