Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.

Polarity of the Drosophila compound eye arises primarily as a consequence of two events that are tightly linked in time and space: fate specification of two photoreceptor cells, R3 and R4, and the subsequent directional movement of the unit eyes of the compound eye, or ommatidia. While it is thought...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanya Wolff, Jake B Guinto, Amy S Rawls
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-05-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1866179?pdf=render
id doaj-274a4cda0d94492191fa3eda516ff781
record_format Article
spelling doaj-274a4cda0d94492191fa3eda516ff7812020-11-25T01:56:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-05-0125e45310.1371/journal.pone.0000453Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.Tanya WolffJake B GuintoAmy S RawlsPolarity of the Drosophila compound eye arises primarily as a consequence of two events that are tightly linked in time and space: fate specification of two photoreceptor cells, R3 and R4, and the subsequent directional movement of the unit eyes of the compound eye, or ommatidia. While it is thought that these fates dictate the direction of ommatidial rotation, the phenotype of mutants in the genes that set up this polarity led to the hypothesis that these two events could be uncoupled.To definitively demonstrate these events are genetically separable, we conducted a dominant modifier screen to determine if genes, when misexpressed, could selectively enhance subclasses of mutant ommatidia in which the direction of rotation does not follow the R3/R4 cell fates, yet not affect the number of ommatidia in which rotation follows the R3/R4 cell fates. We identified a subset of P element lines that exhibit this selective enhancement. We also identified lines that behave in the opposite manner: They enhance the number of ommatidia that rotate in the right direction, but do not alter the number of ommatidia that rotate incorrectly with respect to the R3/R4 fates.These results indicate that fate and direction of rotation can be genetically separated, and that there are genes that act between R3/R4 fate specification and direction of ommatidial rotation. These data affirm what has been a long-standing assumption about the genetic control of ommatidial polarity.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1866179?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tanya Wolff
Jake B Guinto
Amy S Rawls
spellingShingle Tanya Wolff
Jake B Guinto
Amy S Rawls
Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Tanya Wolff
Jake B Guinto
Amy S Rawls
author_sort Tanya Wolff
title Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.
title_short Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.
title_full Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.
title_fullStr Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.
title_full_unstemmed Screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the Drosophila eye.
title_sort screen for genetic modifiers of stbm reveals that photoreceptor fate and rotation can be genetically uncoupled in the drosophila eye.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-05-01
description Polarity of the Drosophila compound eye arises primarily as a consequence of two events that are tightly linked in time and space: fate specification of two photoreceptor cells, R3 and R4, and the subsequent directional movement of the unit eyes of the compound eye, or ommatidia. While it is thought that these fates dictate the direction of ommatidial rotation, the phenotype of mutants in the genes that set up this polarity led to the hypothesis that these two events could be uncoupled.To definitively demonstrate these events are genetically separable, we conducted a dominant modifier screen to determine if genes, when misexpressed, could selectively enhance subclasses of mutant ommatidia in which the direction of rotation does not follow the R3/R4 cell fates, yet not affect the number of ommatidia in which rotation follows the R3/R4 cell fates. We identified a subset of P element lines that exhibit this selective enhancement. We also identified lines that behave in the opposite manner: They enhance the number of ommatidia that rotate in the right direction, but do not alter the number of ommatidia that rotate incorrectly with respect to the R3/R4 fates.These results indicate that fate and direction of rotation can be genetically separated, and that there are genes that act between R3/R4 fate specification and direction of ommatidial rotation. These data affirm what has been a long-standing assumption about the genetic control of ommatidial polarity.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1866179?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT tanyawolff screenforgeneticmodifiersofstbmrevealsthatphotoreceptorfateandrotationcanbegeneticallyuncoupledinthedrosophilaeye
AT jakebguinto screenforgeneticmodifiersofstbmrevealsthatphotoreceptorfateandrotationcanbegeneticallyuncoupledinthedrosophilaeye
AT amysrawls screenforgeneticmodifiersofstbmrevealsthatphotoreceptorfateandrotationcanbegeneticallyuncoupledinthedrosophilaeye
_version_ 1724981693021945856