“Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the Andes

In this article, a critical review is presented in terms of the proposal for sumac kawsay, suma qamaña, or good living (buen vivir), highlighting its conceptual indefinition, the idealized conception of Andean rural world in which it seems to be inspired and its of coherence with the macroeconomic p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreu Viola Recasens
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador 2014-01-01
Series:Íconos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/1209
id doaj-2742f88e39a84acaa6d7c4daf0df3a22
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2742f88e39a84acaa6d7c4daf0df3a222020-11-25T03:15:39ZspaFacultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede EcuadorÍconos 1390-12492224-69832014-01-011848557210.17141/iconos.48.2014.1209“Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the AndesAndreu Viola Recasens0Universidad de BarcelonaIn this article, a critical review is presented in terms of the proposal for sumac kawsay, suma qamaña, or good living (buen vivir), highlighting its conceptual indefinition, the idealized conception of Andean rural world in which it seems to be inspired and its of coherence with the macroeconomic policies promoted to-date by the Bolivian and Ecuadorian governments.https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/1209sumak kawsaydevelopmentwell-beingalternatives to capitalismandean culturesecuadorian constitutionbiocentrism
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreu Viola Recasens
spellingShingle Andreu Viola Recasens
“Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the Andes
Íconos
sumak kawsay
development
well-being
alternatives to capitalism
andean cultures
ecuadorian constitution
biocentrism
author_facet Andreu Viola Recasens
author_sort Andreu Viola Recasens
title “Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the Andes
title_short “Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the Andes
title_full “Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the Andes
title_fullStr “Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the Andes
title_full_unstemmed “Pachamamista” Discourses versus Development Policies: The Debate over Sumak Kawsay in the Andes
title_sort “pachamamista” discourses versus development policies: the debate over sumak kawsay in the andes
publisher Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador
series Íconos
issn 1390-1249
2224-6983
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In this article, a critical review is presented in terms of the proposal for sumac kawsay, suma qamaña, or good living (buen vivir), highlighting its conceptual indefinition, the idealized conception of Andean rural world in which it seems to be inspired and its of coherence with the macroeconomic policies promoted to-date by the Bolivian and Ecuadorian governments.
topic sumak kawsay
development
well-being
alternatives to capitalism
andean cultures
ecuadorian constitution
biocentrism
url https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/1209
work_keys_str_mv AT andreuviolarecasens pachamamistadiscoursesversusdevelopmentpoliciesthedebateoversumakkawsayintheandes
_version_ 1724638339346202624