Underlying processes behind false perspective production

This study aimed to determine the extent to which Reality Monitoring (RM) content analysis can provide useful information when discriminating between actual versus false statements. Participants were instructed to either describe a traffic accident as eyewitness actual role or to describe the accide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio L. Manzanero, Beatriz López, Javier Aróztegui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Servicio de Publicaciones 2016-01-01
Series:Anales de Psicología
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282016000100030&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-271305942ca546fcb6d2243dc625c2ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-271305942ca546fcb6d2243dc625c2ef2020-11-24T22:26:12ZengServicio de PublicacionesAnales de Psicología0212-97282016-01-0132125626510.6018/analesps.32.1.194461S0212-97282016000100030Underlying processes behind false perspective productionAntonio L. Manzanero0Beatriz López1Javier Aróztegui2Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversity of PortsmouthUniversidad Complutense de MadridThis study aimed to determine the extent to which Reality Monitoring (RM) content analysis can provide useful information when discriminating between actual versus false statements. Participants were instructed to either describe a traffic accident as eyewitness actual role or to describe the accident as a simulated victim. Data were analysed in terms of accuracy and quality, and were represented using high dimensional visualization (HDV). In Experiment 1 (between-participant design), participants made significantly more references to cognitive operations, more self-references and less changes in order when describing the event as simulated victim. In Experiment 2 (within-participants design) participants also made significantly more references to cognitive operations and more self references when describing the event from the simulated victim as well as being less accurate, providing less irrelevant information and more evalúative comments. HDV graphics indicated that false statements differ holistically from actual ones.http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282016000100030&lng=en&tlng=enMemoria autobiográficadetección de mentirapsicología del testimoniocredibilidadanálisis de contenidovisualización hiperdimensionalescalado multidimensionalholístico
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonio L. Manzanero
Beatriz López
Javier Aróztegui
spellingShingle Antonio L. Manzanero
Beatriz López
Javier Aróztegui
Underlying processes behind false perspective production
Anales de Psicología
Memoria autobiográfica
detección de mentira
psicología del testimonio
credibilidad
análisis de contenido
visualización hiperdimensional
escalado multidimensional
holístico
author_facet Antonio L. Manzanero
Beatriz López
Javier Aróztegui
author_sort Antonio L. Manzanero
title Underlying processes behind false perspective production
title_short Underlying processes behind false perspective production
title_full Underlying processes behind false perspective production
title_fullStr Underlying processes behind false perspective production
title_full_unstemmed Underlying processes behind false perspective production
title_sort underlying processes behind false perspective production
publisher Servicio de Publicaciones
series Anales de Psicología
issn 0212-9728
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This study aimed to determine the extent to which Reality Monitoring (RM) content analysis can provide useful information when discriminating between actual versus false statements. Participants were instructed to either describe a traffic accident as eyewitness actual role or to describe the accident as a simulated victim. Data were analysed in terms of accuracy and quality, and were represented using high dimensional visualization (HDV). In Experiment 1 (between-participant design), participants made significantly more references to cognitive operations, more self-references and less changes in order when describing the event as simulated victim. In Experiment 2 (within-participants design) participants also made significantly more references to cognitive operations and more self references when describing the event from the simulated victim as well as being less accurate, providing less irrelevant information and more evalúative comments. HDV graphics indicated that false statements differ holistically from actual ones.
topic Memoria autobiográfica
detección de mentira
psicología del testimonio
credibilidad
análisis de contenido
visualización hiperdimensional
escalado multidimensional
holístico
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282016000100030&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniolmanzanero underlyingprocessesbehindfalseperspectiveproduction
AT beatrizlopez underlyingprocessesbehindfalseperspectiveproduction
AT javieraroztegui underlyingprocessesbehindfalseperspectiveproduction
_version_ 1725754202851901440