Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain

Iuliomagus and Vindinum, two neighbouring civitas-capitals, witnessed urban development with two very different dynamics, highlighting distinct conditions of development. While the first underwent from the 20s AD a massive urban restructuring arranged within an orthogonal street-grid covering 90 ha....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pierre Chevet, Martin Pithon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CNRS Éditions 2015-12-01
Series:Gallia
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/gallia/1437
id doaj-2700bdd80ffe48b8aadd366067a0239d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2700bdd80ffe48b8aadd366067a0239d2020-11-25T03:12:34ZengCNRS ÉditionsGallia0016-41192015-12-017219711610.4000/gallia.1437Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbainPierre ChevetMartin PithonIuliomagus and Vindinum, two neighbouring civitas-capitals, witnessed urban development with two very different dynamics, highlighting distinct conditions of development. While the first underwent from the 20s AD a massive urban restructuring arranged within an orthogonal street-grid covering 90 ha. and created in ten years, completely freed of topographical constraints, the second showed a more gradual development, with the laying out of the street-grid extending between 30 and 60-70 AD, with topographical adaptations and programmes to remodel the relief lasting throughout the 1st c. AD at least.These contrasting modes of development created very different urban landscapes. The site at Angers’ which resulted from an overall plan prepared ahead of time and implemented rapidly, presented a ‘frontage urbanism’ apparently uniform and rigid, but it conserved, in the interior of the insulae and at the outskirts, the axes of earlier lay-outs. On the other hand, Le Mans seems to expand and develop without any overall strategy, witnessing a more gradual transformation which seems to have had a profound impact, erasing every trace of any earlier urban landscape. The causes that determined such differing urban development remain an open question. One hypothesis could be based on clear support or strong pressure from the Roman central administration that could have favoured or imposed such a restructuring on Angers. Whatever the political or military motives, they apparently did not apply in Le Mans, where more local demographic and economic needs undoubtedly predominated.http://journals.openedition.org/gallia/1437
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pierre Chevet
Martin Pithon
spellingShingle Pierre Chevet
Martin Pithon
Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain
Gallia
author_facet Pierre Chevet
Martin Pithon
author_sort Pierre Chevet
title Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain
title_short Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain
title_full Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain
title_fullStr Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain
title_full_unstemmed Angers/Iuliomagus, cité des Andécaves, et Le Mans/Vindinum, cité des Cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain
title_sort angers/iuliomagus, cité des andécaves, et le mans/vindinum, cité des cénomans : deux capitales, deux modes de déploiement urbain
publisher CNRS Éditions
series Gallia
issn 0016-4119
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Iuliomagus and Vindinum, two neighbouring civitas-capitals, witnessed urban development with two very different dynamics, highlighting distinct conditions of development. While the first underwent from the 20s AD a massive urban restructuring arranged within an orthogonal street-grid covering 90 ha. and created in ten years, completely freed of topographical constraints, the second showed a more gradual development, with the laying out of the street-grid extending between 30 and 60-70 AD, with topographical adaptations and programmes to remodel the relief lasting throughout the 1st c. AD at least.These contrasting modes of development created very different urban landscapes. The site at Angers’ which resulted from an overall plan prepared ahead of time and implemented rapidly, presented a ‘frontage urbanism’ apparently uniform and rigid, but it conserved, in the interior of the insulae and at the outskirts, the axes of earlier lay-outs. On the other hand, Le Mans seems to expand and develop without any overall strategy, witnessing a more gradual transformation which seems to have had a profound impact, erasing every trace of any earlier urban landscape. The causes that determined such differing urban development remain an open question. One hypothesis could be based on clear support or strong pressure from the Roman central administration that could have favoured or imposed such a restructuring on Angers. Whatever the political or military motives, they apparently did not apply in Le Mans, where more local demographic and economic needs undoubtedly predominated.
url http://journals.openedition.org/gallia/1437
work_keys_str_mv AT pierrechevet angersiuliomaguscitedesandecavesetlemansvindinumcitedescenomansdeuxcapitalesdeuxmodesdedeploiementurbain
AT martinpithon angersiuliomaguscitedesandecavesetlemansvindinumcitedescenomansdeuxcapitalesdeuxmodesdedeploiementurbain
_version_ 1724649774896906240