About not Correcting for Systematic Effects
In practice, measurement results are sometimes described by an estimate, which is not the best one as defined in the GUM. Such alternative estimates arise when the result of a measurement is not corrected for all systematic effects. No recommendation exists in the GUM for associating an uncertainty...
Main Authors: | Klauenberg Katy, Wübbeler Gerd, Elster Clemens |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Measurement Science Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2019-0026 |
Similar Items
-
Effectiveness of Automatic Correction of Systematic Effects in Measuring Chains
by: Dorozhovets Mykhaylo
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Corrections and input quantities in measurement models
by: Pavese F.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Visual acuity improvements after implantation of toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients with astigmatism: a systematic review
by: Agresta Blaise, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01) -
Uncertainty Analysis for Topographic Correction of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images
by: Zhaoning Ma, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Linear Mixed Models: Gum and Beyond
by: Arendacká Barbora, et al.
Published: (2014-04-01)