Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black Carbon

Forest restoration often includes thinning to reduce tree density and improve ecosystem processes and function while also reducing the risk of wildfire or insect and disease outbreaks. However, one drawback of these restoration treatments is that slash is often burned in piles that may damage the so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deborah S. Page-Dumroese, Matt D. Busse, James G. Archuleta, Darren McAvoy, Eric Roussel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Scientifica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2745764
id doaj-26e00aaf82b54a3d9b5acbc264f4477b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26e00aaf82b54a3d9b5acbc264f4477b2020-11-25T00:50:44ZengHindawi LimitedScientifica2090-908X2017-01-01201710.1155/2017/27457642745764Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black CarbonDeborah S. Page-Dumroese0Matt D. Busse1James G. Archuleta2Darren McAvoy3Eric Roussel4USDA FS, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1221 S. Main, Moscow, ID 83843, USAUSDA FS, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 1731 Research Park Dr., Davis, CA 95618, USAUSDA FS, Umatilla National Forest, 72510 Coyote Rd, Pendleton, CA 97801, USAUtah State University, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84332, USANevada Division of Forestry, 2478 Fairview Drive, Carson City, NV 89701, USAForest restoration often includes thinning to reduce tree density and improve ecosystem processes and function while also reducing the risk of wildfire or insect and disease outbreaks. However, one drawback of these restoration treatments is that slash is often burned in piles that may damage the soil and require further restoration activities. Pile burning is currently used on many forest sites as the preferred method for residue disposal because piles can be burned at various times of the year and are usually more controlled than broadcast burns. In many cases, fire can be beneficial to site conditions and soil properties, but slash piles, with a large concentration of wood, needles, forest floor, and sometimes mineral soil, can cause long-term damage. We describe several alternative methods for reducing nonmerchantable forest residues that will help remove excess woody biomass, minimize detrimental soil impacts, and create charcoal for improving soil organic matter and carbon sequestration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2745764
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deborah S. Page-Dumroese
Matt D. Busse
James G. Archuleta
Darren McAvoy
Eric Roussel
spellingShingle Deborah S. Page-Dumroese
Matt D. Busse
James G. Archuleta
Darren McAvoy
Eric Roussel
Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black Carbon
Scientifica
author_facet Deborah S. Page-Dumroese
Matt D. Busse
James G. Archuleta
Darren McAvoy
Eric Roussel
author_sort Deborah S. Page-Dumroese
title Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black Carbon
title_short Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black Carbon
title_full Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black Carbon
title_fullStr Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black Carbon
title_full_unstemmed Methods to Reduce Forest Residue Volume after Timber Harvesting and Produce Black Carbon
title_sort methods to reduce forest residue volume after timber harvesting and produce black carbon
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Scientifica
issn 2090-908X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Forest restoration often includes thinning to reduce tree density and improve ecosystem processes and function while also reducing the risk of wildfire or insect and disease outbreaks. However, one drawback of these restoration treatments is that slash is often burned in piles that may damage the soil and require further restoration activities. Pile burning is currently used on many forest sites as the preferred method for residue disposal because piles can be burned at various times of the year and are usually more controlled than broadcast burns. In many cases, fire can be beneficial to site conditions and soil properties, but slash piles, with a large concentration of wood, needles, forest floor, and sometimes mineral soil, can cause long-term damage. We describe several alternative methods for reducing nonmerchantable forest residues that will help remove excess woody biomass, minimize detrimental soil impacts, and create charcoal for improving soil organic matter and carbon sequestration.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2745764
work_keys_str_mv AT deborahspagedumroese methodstoreduceforestresiduevolumeaftertimberharvestingandproduceblackcarbon
AT mattdbusse methodstoreduceforestresiduevolumeaftertimberharvestingandproduceblackcarbon
AT jamesgarchuleta methodstoreduceforestresiduevolumeaftertimberharvestingandproduceblackcarbon
AT darrenmcavoy methodstoreduceforestresiduevolumeaftertimberharvestingandproduceblackcarbon
AT ericroussel methodstoreduceforestresiduevolumeaftertimberharvestingandproduceblackcarbon
_version_ 1725246739120652288