Changing the world through shareholder activism?

As one of the more progressive facets of the socially responsibleinvestment (SRI) movement, shareholder activism isgenerally recommended or justified on the grounds that itcan create social change. But how effective are differentkinds of activist campaigns likely to be in this regard? Thisarticle o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joakim Sandberg
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library 2011-05-01
Series:Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1733
id doaj-26debc925332445fa1c81f9d314f98c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26debc925332445fa1c81f9d314f98c32020-11-25T01:30:42ZdanNorwegian University of Science and Technology LibraryEtikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics1890-39911890-40092011-05-015110.5324/eip.v5i1.17331556Changing the world through shareholder activism?Joakim Sandberg0Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg As one of the more progressive facets of the socially responsibleinvestment (SRI) movement, shareholder activism isgenerally recommended or justified on the grounds that itcan create social change. But how effective are differentkinds of activist campaigns likely to be in this regard? Thisarticle outlines the full range of different ways in whichshareholder activism could make a difference by carefullygoing through, first, all the more specific lines of actiontypically included under the shareholder activismumbrella and, second, all of the different ways in which ithas been suggested that these could influence the activitiesof commercial companies. It is argued that – althoughmuch more empirical research is needed in the area – thereare at least theoretical reasons for thinking that it will bedifficult to influence companies through the standardactions of filing or voting on shareholder resolutions.However, some alternative strategies open to activists mayallow them to increase their efficacy. It is specificallyargued that even individual investors could be able to pushfor corporate change through devising a radically selfsacrificialcampaign that manages to get the attention ofpowerful forces outside the corporate sphere. https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1733corporate governanceproxy votingshareholderresolutionssocial campaignssocially responsibleinvestment
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joakim Sandberg
spellingShingle Joakim Sandberg
Changing the world through shareholder activism?
Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
corporate governance
proxy voting
shareholderresolutions
social campaigns
socially responsibleinvestment
author_facet Joakim Sandberg
author_sort Joakim Sandberg
title Changing the world through shareholder activism?
title_short Changing the world through shareholder activism?
title_full Changing the world through shareholder activism?
title_fullStr Changing the world through shareholder activism?
title_full_unstemmed Changing the world through shareholder activism?
title_sort changing the world through shareholder activism?
publisher Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library
series Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
issn 1890-3991
1890-4009
publishDate 2011-05-01
description As one of the more progressive facets of the socially responsibleinvestment (SRI) movement, shareholder activism isgenerally recommended or justified on the grounds that itcan create social change. But how effective are differentkinds of activist campaigns likely to be in this regard? Thisarticle outlines the full range of different ways in whichshareholder activism could make a difference by carefullygoing through, first, all the more specific lines of actiontypically included under the shareholder activismumbrella and, second, all of the different ways in which ithas been suggested that these could influence the activitiesof commercial companies. It is argued that – althoughmuch more empirical research is needed in the area – thereare at least theoretical reasons for thinking that it will bedifficult to influence companies through the standardactions of filing or voting on shareholder resolutions.However, some alternative strategies open to activists mayallow them to increase their efficacy. It is specificallyargued that even individual investors could be able to pushfor corporate change through devising a radically selfsacrificialcampaign that manages to get the attention ofpowerful forces outside the corporate sphere.
topic corporate governance
proxy voting
shareholderresolutions
social campaigns
socially responsibleinvestment
url https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1733
work_keys_str_mv AT joakimsandberg changingtheworldthroughshareholderactivism
_version_ 1725090556453847040