A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox Systems

With new sulphur oxides emission limits carried out in 2020, multiple desulphurisation methods have been proposed. The main desulphurisation scrubber systems were chosen and investigated using life cycle assessment. The whole system life is divided into the construction and operational phases. Three...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cui Mengqi, Lu Yingwei, He Jiahao, Ji Lei, Wang Hui, Liu Shaojun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2021-03-01
Series:Polish Maritime Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0010
id doaj-26d4ed4c771048289d31a8bdb5251d52
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26d4ed4c771048289d31a8bdb5251d522021-09-05T14:01:09ZengSciendoPolish Maritime Research2083-74292021-03-0128110511510.2478/pomr-2021-0010A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox SystemsCui Mengqi0Lu Yingwei1He Jiahao2Ji Lei3Wang Hui4Liu Shaojun5Jiangsu university of science and technology, ChinaZhejiang University, ChinaJiangsu university of science and technology, ChinaJiangsu university of science and technology, ChinaJiangsu university of science and technology, ChinaJiangsu university of science and technology, ChinaWith new sulphur oxides emission limits carried out in 2020, multiple desulphurisation methods have been proposed. The main desulphurisation scrubber systems were chosen and investigated using life cycle assessment. The whole system life is divided into the construction and operational phases. Three different systems classified by desulphurisers, namely, seawater, NaOH, and Mg-based systems, were modelled in GaBi software. Moreover, environmental, economic and energy aspects (3E model) were introduced for further analysis. Through this study, some conclusions have been drawn. As for the environmental aspect, the seawater system has the most pleasing performance since the primary emissions come from 1.24E+03 kg CO2 and 1.48E+01 kg chloride. The NaOH system causes 1000 times more emissions than the seawater. The Mg-based system has less pollution than the NaOH system, with 5.86E+06kg CO2 and 3.86E+03 kg chloride. The economic aspect is divided into capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx) to estimate disbursement. The seawater system also has the most favourable cost appearance, which takes 1.7 million dollars without extra desulphuriser expenses, based on 10MW engine flue gas treatment. The next is the Mg-based system, which cost 2 million dollars in CapEx and $ 1200/year in OpEx for the desulphuriser. NaOH uses about 2.5 million dollars for construction and $ 30000/year in desulphuriser. As for the energy aspect, the seawater and Mg-based systems use less non-renewable energy than the NaOH system in the construction phase. In conclusion, the seawater system shows the best performance and could be an alternative in SOx control technologies. This study sheds light on the comprehensive evaluation of marine environmental protection technologies for further optimisation.https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0010life cycle assessmentdesulphurization3e model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cui Mengqi
Lu Yingwei
He Jiahao
Ji Lei
Wang Hui
Liu Shaojun
spellingShingle Cui Mengqi
Lu Yingwei
He Jiahao
Ji Lei
Wang Hui
Liu Shaojun
A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox Systems
Polish Maritime Research
life cycle assessment
desulphurization
3e model
author_facet Cui Mengqi
Lu Yingwei
He Jiahao
Ji Lei
Wang Hui
Liu Shaojun
author_sort Cui Mengqi
title A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox Systems
title_short A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox Systems
title_full A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox Systems
title_fullStr A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Desox Systems
title_sort comparative life cycle assessment of marine desox systems
publisher Sciendo
series Polish Maritime Research
issn 2083-7429
publishDate 2021-03-01
description With new sulphur oxides emission limits carried out in 2020, multiple desulphurisation methods have been proposed. The main desulphurisation scrubber systems were chosen and investigated using life cycle assessment. The whole system life is divided into the construction and operational phases. Three different systems classified by desulphurisers, namely, seawater, NaOH, and Mg-based systems, were modelled in GaBi software. Moreover, environmental, economic and energy aspects (3E model) were introduced for further analysis. Through this study, some conclusions have been drawn. As for the environmental aspect, the seawater system has the most pleasing performance since the primary emissions come from 1.24E+03 kg CO2 and 1.48E+01 kg chloride. The NaOH system causes 1000 times more emissions than the seawater. The Mg-based system has less pollution than the NaOH system, with 5.86E+06kg CO2 and 3.86E+03 kg chloride. The economic aspect is divided into capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx) to estimate disbursement. The seawater system also has the most favourable cost appearance, which takes 1.7 million dollars without extra desulphuriser expenses, based on 10MW engine flue gas treatment. The next is the Mg-based system, which cost 2 million dollars in CapEx and $ 1200/year in OpEx for the desulphuriser. NaOH uses about 2.5 million dollars for construction and $ 30000/year in desulphuriser. As for the energy aspect, the seawater and Mg-based systems use less non-renewable energy than the NaOH system in the construction phase. In conclusion, the seawater system shows the best performance and could be an alternative in SOx control technologies. This study sheds light on the comprehensive evaluation of marine environmental protection technologies for further optimisation.
topic life cycle assessment
desulphurization
3e model
url https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0010
work_keys_str_mv AT cuimengqi acomparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT luyingwei acomparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT hejiahao acomparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT jilei acomparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT wanghui acomparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT liushaojun acomparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT cuimengqi comparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT luyingwei comparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT hejiahao comparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT jilei comparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT wanghui comparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
AT liushaojun comparativelifecycleassessmentofmarinedesoxsystems
_version_ 1717810679837097984