Kahulugan at Kairalan

This essay is a general analysis of how certain ways of understanding the meaningfulness of words (or how certain ways of explaining how words acquire meaning) can affect beliefs regarding what exists in the world. The main focus is the philosophical controversy regarding the meaning of general term...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Napoleon M. Mabaquiao Jr.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Philippines 2000-12-01
Series:Social Science Diliman
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/view/40
id doaj-26d21b83e6bb4c1081305095cee17c1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26d21b83e6bb4c1081305095cee17c1b2020-11-24T23:13:34ZengUniversity of the PhilippinesSocial Science Diliman1655-15242012-07962000-12-0112144Kahulugan at KairalanNapoleon M. Mabaquiao Jr.This essay is a general analysis of how certain ways of understanding the meaningfulness of words (or how certain ways of explaining how words acquire meaning) can affect beliefs regarding what exists in the world. The main focus is the philosophical controversy regarding the meaning of general terms. Accordingly, traditional approaches to this issue disagree on the kinds of entities that ought to exist in order for these terms to be meaningful. The author's analysis of this controversy proceeds as follows. First, it is explained how philosophers classify entities into several kinds and how they generally argue in support of their preference for certain types of entities over others. This discussion also distinguishes the method of linguistic analysis from other philosophical methods in dealing with ontological issues (or issues concerning existence). Then, the claims and arguments of the traditional accounts of the meaning of general terms are presented and explained. Lastly, these accounts are criticized using the perspective of the use theory of meaning of the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. Among others, it is shown that the said accounts all assume the referential theory of meaning, which Wittgenstein strongly criticizes. At the latter part, the author also gives his reflections, in the light of this discourse, on the concept of Filipino as it relates to the issue of national identity.http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/view/40panlahatang salitakahulugankairalanunderstanding wordsmeaningfulness of wordsgeneral terms
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Napoleon M. Mabaquiao Jr.
spellingShingle Napoleon M. Mabaquiao Jr.
Kahulugan at Kairalan
Social Science Diliman
panlahatang salita
kahulugan
kairalan
understanding words
meaningfulness of words
general terms
author_facet Napoleon M. Mabaquiao Jr.
author_sort Napoleon M. Mabaquiao Jr.
title Kahulugan at Kairalan
title_short Kahulugan at Kairalan
title_full Kahulugan at Kairalan
title_fullStr Kahulugan at Kairalan
title_full_unstemmed Kahulugan at Kairalan
title_sort kahulugan at kairalan
publisher University of the Philippines
series Social Science Diliman
issn 1655-1524
2012-0796
publishDate 2000-12-01
description This essay is a general analysis of how certain ways of understanding the meaningfulness of words (or how certain ways of explaining how words acquire meaning) can affect beliefs regarding what exists in the world. The main focus is the philosophical controversy regarding the meaning of general terms. Accordingly, traditional approaches to this issue disagree on the kinds of entities that ought to exist in order for these terms to be meaningful. The author's analysis of this controversy proceeds as follows. First, it is explained how philosophers classify entities into several kinds and how they generally argue in support of their preference for certain types of entities over others. This discussion also distinguishes the method of linguistic analysis from other philosophical methods in dealing with ontological issues (or issues concerning existence). Then, the claims and arguments of the traditional accounts of the meaning of general terms are presented and explained. Lastly, these accounts are criticized using the perspective of the use theory of meaning of the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. Among others, it is shown that the said accounts all assume the referential theory of meaning, which Wittgenstein strongly criticizes. At the latter part, the author also gives his reflections, in the light of this discourse, on the concept of Filipino as it relates to the issue of national identity.
topic panlahatang salita
kahulugan
kairalan
understanding words
meaningfulness of words
general terms
url http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/view/40
work_keys_str_mv AT napoleonmmabaquiaojr kahuluganatkairalan
_version_ 1725597749267660800