Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcare

Objective. To assess the advantages and feasibility of performing postpartum sterilisations laparoscopically in a public healthcare facilityin South Africa (SA).Methods. Retrospective review of postpartum sterilisations between June 2012 and December 2013 at Worcester Hospital, Western Cape,SA. A to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deborah Prince, Ramon Aronius, Gerhard Theron
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Health and Medical Publishing Group 2016-09-01
Series:South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Online Access:http://www.sajog.org.za/index.php/sajog/article/download/1019/510
id doaj-26c19e369a8b42d48ce6954e3e9b12de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26c19e369a8b42d48ce6954e3e9b12de2020-11-24T21:37:58ZengHealth and Medical Publishing GroupSouth African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology2305-88622016-09-012214410.7196/sajog.1019Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcareDeborah PrinceRamon AroniusGerhard TheronObjective. To assess the advantages and feasibility of performing postpartum sterilisations laparoscopically in a public healthcare facilityin South Africa (SA).Methods. Retrospective review of postpartum sterilisations between June 2012 and December 2013 at Worcester Hospital, Western Cape,SA. A total of 78 postpartum sterilisations were included in the study (open n=26, laparoscopic n=52). Data analysis was performed usingmeans and medians with range and standard deviations, two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, two-sample t-test and χ2 test.Results. It was considered preferable to perform laparoscopic sterilisations than the open procedure on patients with a higher body massindex (BMI). Duration of surgery was shorter in the laparoscopic group, especially in patients with BMI >30, and more patients weredischarged on the same day as surgery in the laparoscopic group. There were fewer overall complications in the laparoscopic group (oddsratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.08 - 1.43).Conclusion. It is feasible to perform postpartum sterilisations laparoscopically in a public healthcare facility in SA. Advantages ofthe procedure are clinically significant and in keeping with international literature. Future research should be undertaken regardingacceptability of the procedure in the study population, laparoscopic training and the improvement of provision of requested postpartumsterilisations in public hospitals. http://www.sajog.org.za/index.php/sajog/article/download/1019/510
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deborah Prince
Ramon Aronius
Gerhard Theron
spellingShingle Deborah Prince
Ramon Aronius
Gerhard Theron
Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcare
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
author_facet Deborah Prince
Ramon Aronius
Gerhard Theron
author_sort Deborah Prince
title Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcare
title_short Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcare
title_full Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcare
title_fullStr Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: A role in South African healthcare
title_sort postpartum laparoscopic sterilisation: a role in south african healthcare
publisher Health and Medical Publishing Group
series South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
issn 2305-8862
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Objective. To assess the advantages and feasibility of performing postpartum sterilisations laparoscopically in a public healthcare facilityin South Africa (SA).Methods. Retrospective review of postpartum sterilisations between June 2012 and December 2013 at Worcester Hospital, Western Cape,SA. A total of 78 postpartum sterilisations were included in the study (open n=26, laparoscopic n=52). Data analysis was performed usingmeans and medians with range and standard deviations, two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, two-sample t-test and χ2 test.Results. It was considered preferable to perform laparoscopic sterilisations than the open procedure on patients with a higher body massindex (BMI). Duration of surgery was shorter in the laparoscopic group, especially in patients with BMI >30, and more patients weredischarged on the same day as surgery in the laparoscopic group. There were fewer overall complications in the laparoscopic group (oddsratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.08 - 1.43).Conclusion. It is feasible to perform postpartum sterilisations laparoscopically in a public healthcare facility in SA. Advantages ofthe procedure are clinically significant and in keeping with international literature. Future research should be undertaken regardingacceptability of the procedure in the study population, laparoscopic training and the improvement of provision of requested postpartumsterilisations in public hospitals. 
url http://www.sajog.org.za/index.php/sajog/article/download/1019/510
work_keys_str_mv AT deborahprince postpartumlaparoscopicsterilisationaroleinsouthafricanhealthcare
AT ramonaronius postpartumlaparoscopicsterilisationaroleinsouthafricanhealthcare
AT gerhardtheron postpartumlaparoscopicsterilisationaroleinsouthafricanhealthcare
_version_ 1725936177950752768