Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting Conflicts

This paper takes into view the broad range of contemporary conflicts regarding outdoor lighting. It proposes a working-definition that allows for differentiating lighting conflicts from other forms of lighting-related contention, as well as an analytical framework that allows for the structured des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Josiane Maria Meier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Journal of Sustainable Lighting 2019-02-01
Series:International Journal of Sustainable Lighting
Subjects:
Online Access:http://lightingjournal.org/index.php/path/article/view/89
id doaj-26bdb6bba2194503827aecdbcd61d02b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26bdb6bba2194503827aecdbcd61d02b2020-11-25T00:45:51ZengInternational Journal of Sustainable LightingInternational Journal of Sustainable Lighting2586-12472019-02-0120210.26607/ijsl.v20i2.89Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting ConflictsJosiane Maria Meier0Technische Universität Berlin This paper takes into view the broad range of contemporary conflicts regarding outdoor lighting. It proposes a working-definition that allows for differentiating lighting conflicts from other forms of lighting-related contention, as well as an analytical framework that allows for the structured description of individual lighting conflicts, and the comparative analysis of multiple cases. The analytical framework was developed based on the social-scientific analysis of media reports of existing conflict cases in Europe and North America, and informed by existing knowledge from the fields of lighting and conflict studies. A central challenge for developing such a framework is dealing with the high level of contingency and complexity of lighting conflicts. The framework reduces this complexity by focusing its field of vision to those aspects that are directly related to the lighting and its contestation. For each of these aspects, it provides sets of descriptive variables that allow for describing the conflicts’ individuality in a standardized – and thus comparable – way. The framework strictly separates the regarded aspects from their judgment by the conflict parties, making it possible to contrast their views on one and the same lighting situation. A visual template supports the process of analysis. It allows for depicting individual cases in short, and for clearly identifying where perspectives differ. At the multiple-case level, the framework not only opens up possibilities for spatial and temporal comparisons of lighting conflicts and the subsequent development of typologies, but also for harnessing their potential for informing the development of more sustainable planning and policy approaches for artificial lighting. http://lightingjournal.org/index.php/path/article/view/89lightingconflictcontentionmethodclassification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Josiane Maria Meier
spellingShingle Josiane Maria Meier
Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting Conflicts
International Journal of Sustainable Lighting
lighting
conflict
contention
method
classification
author_facet Josiane Maria Meier
author_sort Josiane Maria Meier
title Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting Conflicts
title_short Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting Conflicts
title_full Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting Conflicts
title_fullStr Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting Conflicts
title_full_unstemmed Contentious Light: An Analytical Framework for Lighting Conflicts
title_sort contentious light: an analytical framework for lighting conflicts
publisher International Journal of Sustainable Lighting
series International Journal of Sustainable Lighting
issn 2586-1247
publishDate 2019-02-01
description This paper takes into view the broad range of contemporary conflicts regarding outdoor lighting. It proposes a working-definition that allows for differentiating lighting conflicts from other forms of lighting-related contention, as well as an analytical framework that allows for the structured description of individual lighting conflicts, and the comparative analysis of multiple cases. The analytical framework was developed based on the social-scientific analysis of media reports of existing conflict cases in Europe and North America, and informed by existing knowledge from the fields of lighting and conflict studies. A central challenge for developing such a framework is dealing with the high level of contingency and complexity of lighting conflicts. The framework reduces this complexity by focusing its field of vision to those aspects that are directly related to the lighting and its contestation. For each of these aspects, it provides sets of descriptive variables that allow for describing the conflicts’ individuality in a standardized – and thus comparable – way. The framework strictly separates the regarded aspects from their judgment by the conflict parties, making it possible to contrast their views on one and the same lighting situation. A visual template supports the process of analysis. It allows for depicting individual cases in short, and for clearly identifying where perspectives differ. At the multiple-case level, the framework not only opens up possibilities for spatial and temporal comparisons of lighting conflicts and the subsequent development of typologies, but also for harnessing their potential for informing the development of more sustainable planning and policy approaches for artificial lighting.
topic lighting
conflict
contention
method
classification
url http://lightingjournal.org/index.php/path/article/view/89
work_keys_str_mv AT josianemariameier contentiouslightananalyticalframeworkforlightingconflicts
_version_ 1725268432382853120