Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study
The authors had previously demonstrated that the Japanese surgical fee schedule had been unequal among surgical specialties in spite of its biannual revisions. This study examined how the degree of inequality of the fee schedule changed by estimating Gini coefficients for efficiency scores computed...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Health Services Insights |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211048130 |
id |
doaj-26bc2275dbdd490ba559198deb850b51 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-26bc2275dbdd490ba559198deb850b512021-10-08T21:33:19ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Insights1178-63292021-10-011410.1177/11786329211048130Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational StudyYoshinori Nakata0Yuichi Watanabe1Hiroshi Otake2Teikyo University Medical Information and System Research Center, Healthcare Management, Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, JapanWaseda University Graduate School of Economics, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Anesthesia, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanThe authors had previously demonstrated that the Japanese surgical fee schedule had been unequal among surgical specialties in spite of its biannual revisions. This study examined how the degree of inequality of the fee schedule changed by estimating Gini coefficients for efficiency scores computed from data envelopment analysis. All the surgeries at Teikyo University Hospital in 2013 to 2018 were candidates used for the analysis of efficiency and equality of fee schedule. Inputs were defined as (1) the number of assistants, and (2) the duration of operation. An output was defined as the surgical fee. Each surgeon’s efficiency score was calculated using data envelopment analysis. Using the medians of efficiency scores in each surgical specialty, the authors inferred Gini coefficients and their standard errors in each year and in each surgical fee schedule. The authors analyzed 16 307 surgical procedures during the study period of 2013 to 2018. There was no statistically significant difference in the Gini coefficients between the years and between the surgical fee schedules ( P > .05). It was demonstrated that the degree of inequality of the Japanese surgical fee schedule remained constant from 2013 through 2018.https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211048130 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yoshinori Nakata Yuichi Watanabe Hiroshi Otake |
spellingShingle |
Yoshinori Nakata Yuichi Watanabe Hiroshi Otake Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study Health Services Insights |
author_facet |
Yoshinori Nakata Yuichi Watanabe Hiroshi Otake |
author_sort |
Yoshinori Nakata |
title |
Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study |
title_short |
Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study |
title_full |
Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr |
Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study |
title_sort |
equality of surgical fee schedule in japan: a retrospective observational study |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Health Services Insights |
issn |
1178-6329 |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
The authors had previously demonstrated that the Japanese surgical fee schedule had been unequal among surgical specialties in spite of its biannual revisions. This study examined how the degree of inequality of the fee schedule changed by estimating Gini coefficients for efficiency scores computed from data envelopment analysis. All the surgeries at Teikyo University Hospital in 2013 to 2018 were candidates used for the analysis of efficiency and equality of fee schedule. Inputs were defined as (1) the number of assistants, and (2) the duration of operation. An output was defined as the surgical fee. Each surgeon’s efficiency score was calculated using data envelopment analysis. Using the medians of efficiency scores in each surgical specialty, the authors inferred Gini coefficients and their standard errors in each year and in each surgical fee schedule. The authors analyzed 16 307 surgical procedures during the study period of 2013 to 2018. There was no statistically significant difference in the Gini coefficients between the years and between the surgical fee schedules ( P > .05). It was demonstrated that the degree of inequality of the Japanese surgical fee schedule remained constant from 2013 through 2018. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211048130 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yoshinorinakata equalityofsurgicalfeescheduleinjapanaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT yuichiwatanabe equalityofsurgicalfeescheduleinjapanaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT hiroshiotake equalityofsurgicalfeescheduleinjapanaretrospectiveobservationalstudy |
_version_ |
1716830975918342144 |