Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study

The authors had previously demonstrated that the Japanese surgical fee schedule had been unequal among surgical specialties in spite of its biannual revisions. This study examined how the degree of inequality of the fee schedule changed by estimating Gini coefficients for efficiency scores computed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoshinori Nakata, Yuichi Watanabe, Hiroshi Otake
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-10-01
Series:Health Services Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211048130
id doaj-26bc2275dbdd490ba559198deb850b51
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26bc2275dbdd490ba559198deb850b512021-10-08T21:33:19ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Insights1178-63292021-10-011410.1177/11786329211048130Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational StudyYoshinori Nakata0Yuichi Watanabe1Hiroshi Otake2Teikyo University Medical Information and System Research Center, Healthcare Management, Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, JapanWaseda University Graduate School of Economics, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Anesthesia, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanThe authors had previously demonstrated that the Japanese surgical fee schedule had been unequal among surgical specialties in spite of its biannual revisions. This study examined how the degree of inequality of the fee schedule changed by estimating Gini coefficients for efficiency scores computed from data envelopment analysis. All the surgeries at Teikyo University Hospital in 2013 to 2018 were candidates used for the analysis of efficiency and equality of fee schedule. Inputs were defined as (1) the number of assistants, and (2) the duration of operation. An output was defined as the surgical fee. Each surgeon’s efficiency score was calculated using data envelopment analysis. Using the medians of efficiency scores in each surgical specialty, the authors inferred Gini coefficients and their standard errors in each year and in each surgical fee schedule. The authors analyzed 16 307 surgical procedures during the study period of 2013 to 2018. There was no statistically significant difference in the Gini coefficients between the years and between the surgical fee schedules ( P  > .05). It was demonstrated that the degree of inequality of the Japanese surgical fee schedule remained constant from 2013 through 2018.https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211048130
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yoshinori Nakata
Yuichi Watanabe
Hiroshi Otake
spellingShingle Yoshinori Nakata
Yuichi Watanabe
Hiroshi Otake
Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study
Health Services Insights
author_facet Yoshinori Nakata
Yuichi Watanabe
Hiroshi Otake
author_sort Yoshinori Nakata
title Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study
title_short Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study
title_full Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Equality of Surgical Fee Schedule in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study
title_sort equality of surgical fee schedule in japan: a retrospective observational study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Health Services Insights
issn 1178-6329
publishDate 2021-10-01
description The authors had previously demonstrated that the Japanese surgical fee schedule had been unequal among surgical specialties in spite of its biannual revisions. This study examined how the degree of inequality of the fee schedule changed by estimating Gini coefficients for efficiency scores computed from data envelopment analysis. All the surgeries at Teikyo University Hospital in 2013 to 2018 were candidates used for the analysis of efficiency and equality of fee schedule. Inputs were defined as (1) the number of assistants, and (2) the duration of operation. An output was defined as the surgical fee. Each surgeon’s efficiency score was calculated using data envelopment analysis. Using the medians of efficiency scores in each surgical specialty, the authors inferred Gini coefficients and their standard errors in each year and in each surgical fee schedule. The authors analyzed 16 307 surgical procedures during the study period of 2013 to 2018. There was no statistically significant difference in the Gini coefficients between the years and between the surgical fee schedules ( P  > .05). It was demonstrated that the degree of inequality of the Japanese surgical fee schedule remained constant from 2013 through 2018.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211048130
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshinorinakata equalityofsurgicalfeescheduleinjapanaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yuichiwatanabe equalityofsurgicalfeescheduleinjapanaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hiroshiotake equalityofsurgicalfeescheduleinjapanaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1716830975918342144