Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projection

In a Volunteer’s Dilemma (VoD) one individual needs to bear a cost so that a public good can be provided. Expectations regarding what others will do play a critical role because they would ideally be negatively correlated with own decisions; yet, a social-projection heuristic generates positive corr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joachim Israel Krueger, Johannes Ullrich, Leonard J Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01909/full
id doaj-26ad938084d54dca96fa0841c83f93e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26ad938084d54dca96fa0841c83f93e02020-11-24T20:59:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-12-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.01909227672Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projectionJoachim Israel Krueger0Johannes Ullrich1Leonard J Chen2Brown UniversityUniversity of ZurichPublic Service DivisionIn a Volunteer’s Dilemma (VoD) one individual needs to bear a cost so that a public good can be provided. Expectations regarding what others will do play a critical role because they would ideally be negatively correlated with own decisions; yet, a social-projection heuristic generates positive correlations. In a series of 2-person-dilemma studies with over 1,000 participants, we find that expectations are indeed correlated with own choice, and that people tend to volunteer more than game-theoretic benchmarks and their own expectations would allow. We also find strong evidence for a social-distance heuristic, according to which a person’s own probability to volunteer and the expectation that others will volunteer decrease as others become socially more remote. Experimentally induced expectations make opposite behavior more likely, but respondents underweight these expectations. As a result, there is a small but systematic effect of overvolunteering among psychologically close individuals.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01909/fullexpectationpublic goodsrationalityprosocialitySocial Dilemma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joachim Israel Krueger
Johannes Ullrich
Leonard J Chen
spellingShingle Joachim Israel Krueger
Johannes Ullrich
Leonard J Chen
Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projection
Frontiers in Psychology
expectation
public goods
rationality
prosociality
Social Dilemma
author_facet Joachim Israel Krueger
Johannes Ullrich
Leonard J Chen
author_sort Joachim Israel Krueger
title Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projection
title_short Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projection
title_full Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projection
title_fullStr Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projection
title_full_unstemmed Expectations and decisions in the Volunteer’s Dilemma: Effects of social distance and social projection
title_sort expectations and decisions in the volunteer’s dilemma: effects of social distance and social projection
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-12-01
description In a Volunteer’s Dilemma (VoD) one individual needs to bear a cost so that a public good can be provided. Expectations regarding what others will do play a critical role because they would ideally be negatively correlated with own decisions; yet, a social-projection heuristic generates positive correlations. In a series of 2-person-dilemma studies with over 1,000 participants, we find that expectations are indeed correlated with own choice, and that people tend to volunteer more than game-theoretic benchmarks and their own expectations would allow. We also find strong evidence for a social-distance heuristic, according to which a person’s own probability to volunteer and the expectation that others will volunteer decrease as others become socially more remote. Experimentally induced expectations make opposite behavior more likely, but respondents underweight these expectations. As a result, there is a small but systematic effect of overvolunteering among psychologically close individuals.
topic expectation
public goods
rationality
prosociality
Social Dilemma
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01909/full
work_keys_str_mv AT joachimisraelkrueger expectationsanddecisionsinthevolunteersdilemmaeffectsofsocialdistanceandsocialprojection
AT johannesullrich expectationsanddecisionsinthevolunteersdilemmaeffectsofsocialdistanceandsocialprojection
AT leonardjchen expectationsanddecisionsinthevolunteersdilemmaeffectsofsocialdistanceandsocialprojection
_version_ 1716782038643638272